Monday, April 22, 2013



IT'S IN THE FINE PRINT....    we show it.


I'M ON THE RIGHT.  I'M NOT POLITE.

Fairtax sounds great -- and it fooled me.

Hey - Fairtax suckers.  Do you know what NIPA IS?


Do you know what a tax base is?    A tax base, by definition, is what they tax.   Remember that.   It's a big fucking deal.  And equally as big, the "NIPA"  trick.






This is the most important part of their fraud -- they do tell you, if you piece it all together, in a very slick, Scientology paid-for way.   

As you will see, Scientologist used this fraud to raise money, not to pass into legislation, but to raise money.  Tea Party dumb asses and other hustlers, like Mike Huckabee, Neal Boortz,  used it to raise money and for political theater. (There are Scientologist and former Scientologist who still use this to pull money out of sucker's pockets. )

 It sounded great -- why not?


  If you can find all their "research" documents (no easy task) these lying bastards actually tucked away -- carefully -- about 300 words, a few here, a few there.  

SOME OF THOSE 300 WORDS.....


NIPA is not a word, but by far the sneakiest bit  in their fraud -- by fraud we mean deliberately deceptive.   They used this term in their "research" documents. 

Is it their fault you didn't find those 60 or so documents, and read every word, every footnote, and dissect every definition, then correlate that to the math tables?

Is it their fault you believed their books, videos and speeches giving you distortion,  after lie, after distortion?   Is it their fault you believed their slogans?   




MOONBEAMS AND BABY FART TAX
2 TRILLION DOLLARS. 



Fairtax bullshit comes down to this -- rather like pretending to tax moonbeams and baby farts  for 2 trillion,  then using 300 or so words, to admit it's total bullshit, based on goofy-ass preposterous assumptions and definition tricks. 

Like, definition of a person.  Like, definition of consumption expenditures.  Like, definition of "taxable employer".   Like use of preposterous "assumptions".

 Of course they were not going to tell you they tax moonbeams and baby farts --instead, they tax "all government consumption expenditures"  without exception.  




William Gale, PhD Stanford, head of President Bush Tax Advisory Panel, exposed Fairtax fraud over a decade ago -- showing the same things we do, but in a polite academic way.In private, he said Fairtax lying bastards (not his term) "lied a lot".  Oh hell yes, a whole lot. 

We arent so polite.  In fact, if you are offended by cursing, blunt talk, and exposing liars, get off this page. Really. 


THEY TOLD YOU THIS.



THEY LIED.


NIPA TRICK.
BASIC TRICK BY THE LYING BASTARDS
This is from their own document. It's a big fucking deal.  Did you ever see this?  It's in one of their documents.  One of their "research"  documents, so they told you, never mind they never told you in books, videos speeches, articles, etc.   They tax whatever NIPA defines as personal or governmental "consumption expenditures"

DEAR FAIRTAX SUCKERS.

DO YOU KNOW WHAT NIPA IS?

FUCK NO, YOU DON'T. 

But its a Big Fucking Deal in Fairtax.



From Fairtax official document, one of may Fairtax own documents we show you.

 Still very slick, but notice anything? Every line they match up with NIPA.  This is from their "tax base" document, which you would never see, if not for me. 

Tax base is, by definition, what they tax.  

Notice --no listing for personal retail sales.   Yes, they would tax retail sales, but they dare not list it, or you would see, the retail sales tax is but a tiny part of their taxes.

They have massive, massive, did we mention massive, other taxes, on things like Medicare patients, on all city county and states for wage and pension expenditures -- on and on. In fact, most of Fairtax has nothing to do with normal retail sales.

REMOVING EDUCATION EXPENDITURES


They did "remove" education expenditures, from the "tax base". 

Very clever -- because they did not remove anything else.   In the tax base is all government, all city, all county, all state, and even all federal, "consumption expenditures".

Since "tax base" means, "we tax this 23%" -- and because their math is based on "without exception,"  they pretend to tax all city, all county, all state, all federal expenditures WITHOUT EXCEPTION, that is in the "tax base".

And only "education expenditures"  are "removed" from the tax base.  Clever as hell.  But can they actually get 1 billion dollars from NYC as a tax on wage, pension, capital expenditures, and operational expenditures?

FUCK NO.

Can they actually get state legislature of Texas to "remit" (send in) a check for 14 to 18 billion dollars?  FUCK NO.

Can they actually get a cancer victim on Medicaid to pay 40,000 dollars for her consumption tax?  FUCK NO.

But these are the kinds of things in their "tax base"   and very much the biggest part of t heir tax revenue projections.

___________________________________

  This is the entirety of how they "remove"  education expenditures from the tax base.  But all other personal and government "consumption expenditures"  are in the tax base.  Tax base by definition is what they pretend to tax, and that "without exception" 



___________________________________


They had to work very hard at this fraud, so they did.

 They actually hired Beacon Hill, a public relations firm, to smooth it out, to dangle the wangle, to put the "assumptions"  and bullshit about tax base, etc, in papers they hilariously called research -- and fraudulently (deceptively) called "research".

Research my ass, unless deliberate deception is research.

  We show you their role in the fraud -- deliberate deception.

WITHOUT EXCEPTION...




From HR 25 - the actual bill.  So they did tell you, right?   Very cleverly, they did the "distraction" trick.  They tell you they tax all consumption once and only once "without exception".

But they never tell you they tax all cities on all pension wage, capital investment, and operational expenditures, without exception. 

They never tell you they tax all Medicare patients, without exception, a 23% tax on their "consumption" (notice, not payments toward, but consumption of).   But that is how their math works.

You are bedazzled by how great that sounds, and you are oblivious to how they use "consumption"   and without exception.  In fact, you can not possibly know how tricky these bastards are, until you put it all together, including their math.




Almost as important as the NIPA trick (they tax whatever NIPA defines as personal or governmental consumption expenditures, remember?)  is the "without exception" word game.  They tax all that, without exception.

They told without exception, if you looked very closely, as we did.

Without exception means, as you will see, their math depends on someone paying a 23% tax, without exception, on all wage, pension and capital investments that city county and states "expend".

That's in the math, too. Their math depends on that. Without Exception. Did they not tell you?

Is it their fault you assumed the slogans about simple retail sales tax were true?  Is  it their fault you believed it was some simple retail tax, paid "at point of purchase"  because they said so?

They said a lot of fucking things, conflicting sneaky ass things, and based their fraudulent math on those sneaky absurd word games. And of course they did it all intentionally, they are lying bastards, and this was a fraud from day one, sentence one, word one. 


And they did tell you -- without exception.   All wage, all pension, all capital investment expenditures, all Medicare consumption, all government operational expenditures is -- without exception -- taxed.

But that is how their math works, based on the disjointed bullshit word games in their documents. 

But to suckers, they give the impression it's just a "very very simple personal retail sales tax at point of purchase".  Fucking liars. 




SIMPLE RETAIL SALES TAX MY ASS




They tax, as a starter, whatever NIPA defines as personal or governmental consumption.   The retail sales part is a small part. 

See anything in there about retail sales?  Hell  no.  Well, they do tax retail sales, but they are not about to list that part.   If you happened to see that, and then see all other other taxes too, you might figure out, the retail sales tax is but a small part of Fairtax.


NO MORE FUNDING FOR SOCIAL SECURITY
NO TAXES COMING IN FOR IT.

NO MORE FUNDING FOR MEDICARE.
NO TAXES COMING IN FOR IT.

Fairtax would simply END all payroll taxes, which provides all the money to fund Social Security and Medicare now.   

No more of ANY of these taxes, income tax, gone, Social Security taxes (Medicare Medicaid) gone. Not one dime -- literally not a dime-- coming in for that purpose. Not one dime.

Yet Social Security checks are paid from this money coming in.   Social Security provides -- contrary to what FOX SPEWS tells you -- more money coming in to Treasury, than they pay out.   Eventually that may tip, to more coming OUT, but right now, more is coming in.

 Fairtax lying bastards just get rid of all that money coming in!

The same lying bastards claim in some places, they will still fund Social Security and Medicare, but have absolutely no rational way to pay any of it.

But in other places, Fairtax lying bastards parse words, like Boortz claiming cleverly there will be so much money coming in from this goofy absurdity, the US will have plenty to fund anything. In fact, the problem, Boortz told suckers, would be TOO much money coming in.

And of course, they know that. 



If they ONLY taxed personal retail sales, as President Bush Tax Panel proved and reported,  the tax rate would need to be 89%.

Even tea party suckers are smart enough to ask "89% sales tax? Are you nuts?"

You don't have to be stupid to be fooled by Fairtax -- just accept their slogans as facts, would do it.

The massive other taxes, like cancer tax on Medicare patients, like a pension and operational expenditure tax, on all cities and states.  A 23 or 30% tax on all that, without exception.

Said briefly -- to make their fraudulent math work, on paper, Scientologist and the other hustlers, had to create a "tax base"  so large, that a 23% tax would seem to work.

They told you that -- sorta kinda - in a few words, in various documents, footnotes and definitions.   But you would have to put those all together, a job far too complicated for most GOP voters, much less Tea Party suckers.

Besides -- why doubt Mike Huckabee, Neal Boortz, and FOX SPEWS?   They claimed all this research.  They would not lie, right?




_________________________________________

NIPA??


 What the fuck is NIPA? In one sentence, in one document you never would even see, except for someone like me, they did say it.  They tax whatever NIPA defines as personal and governmental consumption expenditures.



SO what the fuck are personal and governmental "consumption expenditures".   Turns out, the way these bastards used that term, it means whatever they care to throw in the "tax base"  is in the tax base.

Want to throw in all military spending?   You don't have to show that clearly, just show the total consumption.   Military expenditures are in there.

Yes, even the federal government, Neal Boortz told us in a very fraudulent way, has to pay taxes.   The next sentence out of Boortz mouth, however, made it seem like government would be taxed on retail purchases.

Oh hell no-- on all wage, pension, capital investments, and operational expenditures.  If a city pays a police department 20 million a  year for wages, benefits, and operational expenditures, your city (really) would owe the fed government almost 5 million, almost 25% tax (23%). 

And all cities, all counties, all states, they say cleverly, in a document would never likely see, should "raise their tax rates" to pay it.

So California would have to raise its taxes 20 billion, LA County, raise its taxes by 700 million, LA city itself, another raise in taxes, 800 million.   No, they never told you the amounts -- too obvious -- but in the "research" -- what the had the balls to call research -- are these stunningly goofy and high impossible taxes.



Impossible because they know California general assembly is not going to just write a check for 20 billion. It's preposterous, and you can't force them, or anyone, to do so.

Los Angeles County is not going to write a huge check either. Nor will Keokuk Iowa, Springfield Illinois, or Dade County Florida.




Fairtax has never told anyone -- not in any candid way -- about these taxes.  Cities don't know. Hell, their own "sponsors"  and spokesmen for Fairtax often claim no such taxes are in Fairtax, never mind the math in their tax tables, and their tax base documents, showing otherwise.

Nor will cancer victims on Medicare send in 40K or whatever the amount would be,  because they would not have that much money in the first place.  

But, those are the kinds of taxes President Bush found -- and we found -- and you can find -- if you just read the fine print, all of it, and their math, very carefully.

And yes, Boortz knew that -- was well aware of that -- when he cleverly and deceptively made his readers assume, falsely, that city county and states would just pay retail sales tax, like when they bought a printer, or a computer monitor. Not a big deal!




But paying taxes on wage and pension and operational  expenditures (see their fine print and math) would be a drastic tax, goofy as hell, and no city county or state could be forced to pay it.

Do you think Neal Boortz is going to every city in the USA and force them to pay 20, 40, 50 million dollars or more, because these goofy lying bastards put some nonsense double talk, in a footnote, and then cleverly listed that consumption in their "tax base".

Boortz and others -- NEVER BELIEVED A FUCKING WORD THEY SAID.  It was always a lie.  Always. 




Why throw all  city county and state police wage, pension, and benefit expenditures into the "tax base".

They had to. They had no choice but to add all that into the tax base, to make the math add up on paper. 

Yet, they told you it was  a very simple retail sales tax in the narrative, books, videos, speeches, on and on, for 15 years.   They told on FOX SPEWS, they told you online, they told you in books, they told you in thousands of social media post, they had speakers and "training" and articles in hundreds of newspapers.

Every time, every book, every training, every speech, every  video, they sold it as a very simple personal retail sales tax, 23%, all researched, 22 million of research if they mentioned research.

From Fairtax web site -- this used to be their opening image......




SIMPLE RETAIL SALES TAX MY ASS




They purposely made you believe, in official documents, in books, in videos, in thousands of speeches, and articles, on TV interviews, in slogans, in graphics, in examples that they were a very very simple personal retail sales tax.   

All researched. Very simple.  You chose your taxes because you chose what you buy at the store or restaurant.   Buy used things -- no taxes.   Grow your own food -- no tax.  

Stop social security taxes, stop medicare taxes, stop all fed taxes -- just that retail sale tax -- and you pay the same price for goods and services!

Your coat will still cost 100 dollars, because the tax won't matter!   All prices will drop 22% --- a scientific fact, proven by extensive research.   So your 23% tax won't even matter.  

You get a prebate anyway -- everyone legal in the US, will get a
"prebate" check, to pay your taxes on "necessities".  


Your new house, yes, that is taxed too,  they wanted to be "candid".  But that will drop in price too - by the same, or nearly the same, as the tax.   

And it's all proven by research from the top economist in the world.  Designed by economist, at Harvard, at Heritage, at CATO.   


Only liars, and tax accountants, and lobbyist will be against it.   Watch those guys, Neal Boortz told us, they will come out against t his with every lie, every distortion.


____________________________________________________

NO MENTION OF THE IMPOSSIBLE GOOFY TAXES


Slogans. Every slogan by Fairtax sounded great, and every slogan was a lie.  It is not a retail sales tax.  It is not simple. It is not even rational.

There is no research, much less 22 million dollars of research. In fact, I will give 50K -- really -- to anyone who can show 1 page of Fairtax research about a simple personal retail sales tax of 23% to replace all other fed taxes.  

How hard can it be -- they have 22 million in research, and can't show 1 page of it?   See details of offer,--and see what these lying bastards, tried to pass off as research, below.

CAN THIS MEDICARE PATIENT PAY 32K in fed taxes on her consumption of surgery and chemo?   Fuck no.

But Fairtax lying bastards -- we show you -- have fine print and math tricks that have all medicare patients paying impossible massive taxes, without exception. 

And to show you how utterly goofy Fairtax is -- they also get rid of all Medicare and Medicare revenue -- a full 1/3 of fed government overall revenue.  So they unfund things, then tax the patients.  Yes, it's that silly.  And yes, they know it. 



 Actually, you would be personally liable for a 46, 000 fed tax, if you "consumed" (not purchased)  200,000 dollars in cancer surgery and chemo.

And that 10 dollar "maybe"  tax Boortz tried to act as if he was so "candid" for telling you about?   Try a 30 40 or 50 dollar tax on an office visit, and blood test.   

No matter what the objection --40,000 tax on a new home, don't worry, according to Boortz,  prices drop 40K anyway.   SO you will pay the same?  

JUST BUY USED.

Boortz had a clever quip for suckers -- " just buy used" he said. Just  grow your own food.  Fine.

Ever hear of used rent?  How about used car insurance?  How about used nursing home care -- a 35,000 fed tax on about 14 months of nursing home care.

Oh, Boortz "forgot" to mention that, and gave you this shit lie about "maybe" a ten dollar tax on an office  visit. And he gave you that lie, because he didn't dare tell you of the 46K fed tax on fighting cancer, for many people. 


"It will be a wash"   Boortz wrote, everything will cost so much less, the tax, whatever it is, won't matter.  A "wash".  And he had 22 million dollars of research to prove it.

Fucking lying bastards, because that's not what any actual research said or implied.  And they have no research anyway.  They have double speak bullshit.

Over and over, even when he coyly admitted cancer victims would have to pay a 23% tax on cancer surgery, he said "Don't worry, we will save her (breast cancer victim) that much.

No, they won't save anyone anything, because it's a goofy ass fraud that they have no intention to ever pass. It just sounds good to stupid people -- which is valuable asset. 

WILL ALL STATES SAVE BIG TOO?

Also, not one word about the 20 billion the state of California would owe,  the 1 billion, yes billion, New York City would owe, the 900 billion Los Angeles County would owe, and on and on.

Boortz was in and out of Texas a hundred times -- each time, he "forgot"  to mention the huge tax on Texas state legislature?

He was in and out of Atlanta a thousand times, somehow each time, never a word about the massive taxes on wages, pensions, capital investments, they would owe.  Guess he forgot.

Each time -- Boortz forgot, and all Fairtax hustlers, forgot to mention it. Little detail. Slipped their mind. Can't remember everything, ever trip. 

Those massive taxes on all expenditures, wages, pensions, operational expenditures, and capital expenditures - 23% tax on virtually everything, but education expenditures, those are "removed from the tax base". 

Everything else is still "in the tax base".   Meaning, by definition, they tax it, and count that as revenue to be collected.

 Would their pensions, capital investments, and operational expenditures drop by 20 billion? No -- in fact, Fairtax documents tell you -- all city county and states, they assume, will raise their tax rates sufficiently to pay it!

Hell no.  See more about that amazing "detail" below -- because Fairtax find print actually admits all city county and states would have to "raise their tax rates" sufficiently to pay these huge other taxes. 

But  to find those kinds of things, you have to read very closely, and read all the documents, which they make as difficult as they can.

So, not one word to the public, in any reasonable way, about the massive tax increases at all city county and state levels, that is implicit in their footnotes, and "assumptions" you never see.

   Later, they added a few words here and there, took out the most gregarious deceptive images,  like the introducing image of Fairtax being a "tax on personal retail consumption".






But they DID tell you, that they assume all city county and states will have to raise their tax rates.  No, they didnt say by how much, but sworn estimates -- sworn in written testimony to Ways Means Committee -- estimated by 30-40% across the board increases in all city, all county, and all state tax rates.

But they did tell you, right?  In that one sentence, in that one footnote, in that one document.   






RESEARCH FRAUD....

Fairtax fooled me because the claims of 22 million in research -- very specific claims.  They named names of researchers.

Who would lie about THAT?  Turns out, for  Fairtax lying bastards, that was the main lie.  What made it so appealing, research,  was the biggest lie of all.  
They gave names, too, of "researchers".   Very bold. 

They made it seem like people who, at one time or another, agreed that a "consumption" tax might have merit,  to mean these folks did some very sophisticated  research about Fairtax HR25.

Oh hell no. That never happened.  In fact, HR25 and the research are goofy as hell, but dressed up. to fool you.

There was no research -- as you will see.  And no, that is no overstatement.  They did no research whatsoever, on a very very simple personal retail sales tax,  to replace all other fed taxes, including Medicare and Social Security.

SO they, like most things Scientologist, were bold hustlers. Why go half way? 

The problem with naming names of your researchers -- you could contact them, and see if they did that research.

SO I DID.

____________________________________

Contacting the researchers

I did exactly that,  by email.   I was not a skeptic then.  I was just trying to sort a  few things out, like why did I find in the fine print, mention of taxes on city county and states.  

I asked Fairtax spokesmen about where in HR25 they had this massive tax on city county and states.   The math,  if looked at closely, does have massive taxes on city county and states.

Where is that, exactly, please show it to me,   Where does that say any such thing in HR25?

Oh yes, Fairtax spokesmen and "researcher"   Steve Bennett said, it's there.  They do tax all wages, pensions, operational expenditures, etc, etc, paid out by any city, any state, any county.  Even the federal government has to pay.

Okay BUT WHERE THE FUCK IS THAT IN HR 25?

He finally told me "HERE IT IS"  and sent me this, from HR25.




Steve Bennett -- #2 man in Fairtax, official spokesmen, said this word, THIS WORD, in a defintion, is the "legal basis" for the massive taxes on all city, all county, and all states.



The definition of a person -- in HR25 -- includes the word "government"  in a long rambling sentence.     Any government is a person -- and a very special kind of person.

Here is the page, with no highlights.....



The government is a "special" person who has to pay taxes on wage, pension, capital expenditures,  operational expenditures, essentially anything any city county our state "pays out" -- they have to "remit" 23% tax (in advance) to the fed government.


CLEAR ENOUGH ALREADY BENNETT SAID.

This 'definition" is far down in a list of other definitions, after such definitions as "definition of inventory"  and definitions of "Professional Currier Services". 

Remember that, while they DO have this word "government" in a long rambling section, it's only after mind numbing other goofy ass definitions,  which 99% of people would not even read. 

And even then, there is no earthy way, no possible way, that one word, in that one definition, can alter anyone to anything, much less alert all city county and states, nor the public, of these 2 trillion dollars of taxes.

Do you see why we call these lying bastards -- lying bastards?  Well, it is there, the defintion.  But it's meaningless, and quite the opposite of  research.  

They not only did not research this  shit -- they hid these words so you would be fooled.  We call them lying bastards, because they are.  

And Bennett -- who seems goofy as hell to us -- says that is "clear enough" to city county and states.  They (Fairtax officials) do not need to explain further.  That one word was enough to alert all city county and state officials, and the public, that there is this massive tax on city county and sates.


I could only find one -- one -- person, who would claim to be part of the research, and who knew what was in the fine print!

The "CATO" guys were very deceptive, and evasive, would not respond to specific questions, and just repeated slogans Fairtax used.   They seemed either clueless that slogans are not answers.  But that was all they could do, repeat slogans.


Later, oddly, Cato backed off Fairtax, which made me wonder -- did Fairtax hustlers quit paying them, or did they read the fine print themselves?  Odd.  

Grover Norquest also pushed it, as did FOX SPEWS, Hannity, and Neal Cavuto.   Those guys do, suddenly and without explanation, backed off Fairtax, as far as I could tell.    One day, Fairtax would save the USA, create wealth for the public and government, and make the USA the "economic powerhouse of the world"  BS.

Next day, it seemed silence about the Fairtax miracle. 

If you did not know some folks are paid to push political frauds, you are about to learn.

So I read more of the "research"  documents from Fairtax -- not that easy to find.   More, Fairtax "research documents"  are impressive dances of bullshit, but never clear, in any one place.  A few words here and there that seemed to matter. And a lot of misdirection, a lot of words to give you the exact opposite impression. 



I then asked the "researchers" more questions, better able to ask questions, once I knew something about what was in the documents.

   What the fuck researchers were they talking about?

I could only find one guy  -- one - person on their list of "researchers"  who seemed to have any part in the supposed research. As far as I could tell, he was head of Beacon Hill, who claims to be "educational organization"  but seems instead to push any bullshit, that anyone hires them to push.

Only Larry did more than push the bullshit. Larry helped to write it, in the first place.  I show his shit below, Larry Kotlikoff, who was paid.

Larry is a researcher like the health warning on toxic gas, is "research".    Larry did not research any of this, if you know what the definition of  research is.  See below.

   If he did research it, Larry sure as hell did not let anyone know it.
What Larry put out was actually the clever double talk deception - quite the opposite of research.   And he made a lot of money doing it, if Bruce Bartlett is correct.

Kotlikoff, still, is the ONLY person I could find that even knew what was in the "research"  -- such as massive taxes on city county and states.  And he wrote many of the documents which are full of double speak, not research whatsoever.

_______________________________________________________________

"WE ASSUME" WEASEL WORDS YOU NEVER SEE..

Did you know Fairtax research "assumes"  all city county and state taxes will have to increase -- they tell you, cleverly, in a footnote. Yes, a footnote.  Did we mention footnote?

Even there, in the footnote, they do not explain this would mean massive tax increases at state and local level, but they did say a few words, in a document you would never see, if not for me, mostly likely.





So  -- if you ignored their narrative, if you ignored everything else they said and lied about, and you found this document, and read every word, maybe you could spot it,.

No fairtax sucker ever found it. In fact, I spoke with (via email or twitter) several "experts" on Fairtax that spoke for them officially. They never had a clue about this, or other things I showed them.

Why didn't they know?  Because you have to dig, read every word, and ignore the preponderance of bullshit they surrounded the fine print with.

Funny, everyone one of Fairtax suckers we interacted with, swore on their children's lives they knew all the fine print, knew all the definitions -- they didn't know shit, which became quickly apparent when we asked them if Fairtax taxed wage, pension, and capital investments.


Larry stopped communication instantly when I started to quiz him on the specifics of his crap, like the "assumption" above.,

Larry was always clever -- maybe you don't call deceptive clever double talk a  lie but I do, and that is how I use the word lie here.  Taxing Sales??  That's what he named it. Then he cleverly inserted some few words about a fee paid for states to gather taxes on investments, and made damn sure you never realized they had massive taxes on every city county and state, that would likely be the biggest single expense most cities had!

If you got them to admit they taxed cities counties and states at all, they tried an end run about "retail sales".  Bull fucking crap, they tax virtually EVERYTHING any city county or state does, including wage and pension expenditures, operational expenditures, capital expenditures.

And of course, to hide this slick shit, as Beacon Hill did, takes effort.  They had to actually discuss how to hide this, or mention that, a few words  here and there.

If they were honest, just mistaken, they would have listed the wages, pensions and capital investments, and made it clear what cities would pay.  None thing like- - quite the reverse.

The others I found, had no clue of, absolutely no clue of, these massive other taxes, such as the massive taxes on city county and wages.    But they were listed as "researchers".

Even more amazing, the "Harvard" researcher that Boortz made seem so supportive of Fairtax, did not support that 23%shit at all, with all prices dropping, etc,.   Boortz specifically made it seem like Jorgenson proved all prices will drop. Bullshit, and Jorgenson said otherwise. He said prices could not drop unless all employees allowed -- let -- their employers keep all the money they used to pay in taxes, and then use that money to lower taxes.

Think of that.  The only way prices could fall, is if all employees allowed -  without any mention in HR25 about it -- employers to keep the money they used to pay in Social Security and Mediare and income tax, and then lower their prices with that money.

How fucking goofy is that? Everyone just gives their employer a ton of money, and then the employer supposedly voluntarily reduces prices by that amount?

Remember this - it's important.  Boortz is the fucker that sold the suckers the fraud, that Jorgenson practically invented  the Fairtax claim that all prices drop. No, they fucking don't drop.   And yes,  Boortz knew that the entire time.   See one of Boortz's very clever "Neal Nuze"  blogs where he "clarifies"  that whole "keep your whole paycheck" crap he pushed, after Jorgenson gave an interview to the contrary.

More about him- - Dale Jorgenson -- later. 

So yes, Boortz was always a liar, always a hustler on this, and other matters. He fooled me, but not for long. 



We need an entirely new tax code.   But as you will see, Fairtax started as a fund raising fraud by lying bastards in Scientology.   It's not even a tax code, it's goofy ass nonsense.   



Still, if getting rid of our tax code means passing Scientologist fund raising fraud, okay.  Pass the fraud. 

Maybe then we will not be so easily fooled by the slogans from self confident bastards and hustlers.   Maybe then we will read the fine print, closely....

UNDER CONSTRUCTION...

Come back when I have this all cleaned up..... Besides, language here is rude, crude, caustic-- do not proceed if you are offended by crude rude (but honest) language.

PASS THIS SCIENTOLOGY FRAUD. You may be surprised who started, and who continues to raise money from stupid people, from Fairtax fraud.  




Their own document.  Did you know this?



Did you know Fairtax taxes every city, county and state, on pension, wage, capital investment, and operational expenditure?

No?  Well guess what, it's in their very clever fine print, and the basis of their math.

Did you know that all cancer victims, even those on Medicare, are taxed on their "consumption" (not just purchases) of health care?   Again, that is in their fine print, cleverly vague, but very much the basis for their math.





If all cancer victims, including Medicare patients, and the poor, do not pay these taxes, as Neal Boortz cleverly explained it "then it's not Fairtax, it's something else."

You have to spot the clever word games these liars play.

Likewise, if all city, all county, and all state governments do not pay 23% tax on all expenditures, on all wage expenditures, all pension expenditures, all capital expenditures, then it's not Fairtax, it's "something else".

Fairtax math requires a tax base that includes all Medicare expenditures, all city county and state expenditures, all capital expenditures.  And indeed, their fine print tricks -- we show you -- does exactly that, in the sections about "TAX BASE"

TAX BASE = WHAT THEY TAX


But they have 22 million in research, right?   Over and over we are told of the amazing research..

Importantly, what they call "research" is actually their own fraudulent written bullshit.  We show you their own documents, which they themselves called "research". 

   I now offer 50K (a serious legal offer, see details below) to anyone who can show a page of that 22 million in "research"  that proves Fairtax is a simple personal  retail sales tax, paid at "point of purchase"  to replace all other fed taxes.

Their documents they call research is where they put most of the fraud. 


Why are their documents not research --

 because this is the kind of impossible hidden bullshit that is in their own "research" ... the other taxes, that are not retail taxes at all, not personal taxes, and not even possible.  But very necessary to use, for their fraudulent math to "add up:" 

\

 Such fine print tricks, necessary to use, for their fraudulent math to "add up:" 

Voluntary my ass. 



Total  lie.  Fairtax has massive other taxes -- impossible goofy other taxes- - that are far, far larger than the retail sales tax,  And this bastard knew it, the entire time.  He was not mistaken, he was lying, as you can tell by his clever word games, which always gave the exact opposite impression, of what Fairtax actually taxed, and he, more than anyone, pushed the "research"  meme, which was never true. 




I found the fine print tricks,   So did others, including President Bush Tax Advisory Panel, who exposed the fraud over 10 years ago, politely.,

I expose this shit --but I'm not polite.  And I'm terrible at blogging.  S



 Fairtax put out a blatantly fraudulent "calculator"   -- if you knew the hustle, that is, they don't tax just retail sales.  See more below about this "calculator" fraud.






Did you know that Fairtax has taxes on all city, county, state, and federal wage, pensions, and capital investments?  23% tax?  Did you know that?

Hell no.


FOOTNOTE 19??

Like "Footnote 19" in a fairtax research document, that says they "adopt a prepayment approach"  to taxing government investment.  Turns out, their "investment" tax includes a tax on all government operational expenditures, and wage expenditures, and pension expenditures.

That's as close as they come to telling you about these massive other taxes, this slick "prepay approach" nonsense.  You never, ever get a clear statement they tax all government wages, pensions, benefits, and operational expenditures.  You can find it, a few words here, and there, like President Bush Tax Panel did, and like we did.

They needed to distort, of course, for their fraudulent math to "add up:" 



_______________________________________________

WORD GAMES
BY LYING BASTARDS. 


The fine print is tricky as hell -- but at least they wrote fine print. Most lying bastards ONLY use slogans.  These lying bastards had fine print, if you could find it, and decode it. 


This is me -- Mark Curran.  I really was fooled by these lying bastards, and I really do offer a reward to anyone if they can show one page of that 22 million dollar non-existent research about this "very very simple" personal retail sales tax of 23% to replace all other fed taxes.  See details of the offer. 


Both these guys got paid to push FaIrtax fraud.

Yes, they did. They were paid. 

A self confident hustler like Boortz was a great asset to Fairtax.   Fast talking, great with slogans, willing to lie  his ass off, in print, for a price.


__________________________________________

GRASP THIS

If your city "expends" 10 million on police and fire protection, your city owes 2 million, 300,000 to the federal government.

That's in their "research" -- and much more.No, they do NOT make it clear, even there, but they tell you,  in clever deceptive ways, and as we show, their math is based on such absurdities.

__________________________________________

 WHAT THEY CALL RESEARCH.....
NOT A RETAIL SALES TAX....

It is not a simple personal retail sales tax to replace all other fed taxes, because they have 2 trillion or more, in these impossible other taxes, that are NOT retail sales taxes, 

Does a tax -- in advance or not -- on your city for it's pension and wage expenditures, sound like a simple retail sales tax?

Of course not.  But they do, and we show you, tax all wage, pension and capital investment expenditures, operational expenditures.  

WTF. What the holy fuck.

But these bastards who came up with the hustle, were Scientology bastards, yes they were.  It was a fund raising scam, not a tax code.  Remember that too.

IT'S IN THE REVENUE PROJECTIONS

Most of Fairtax revenue projections have nothing to do with personal retail sales.  Try to grasp that.

Not once, not ever, have they showed their suckers a total of personal retail sales.   You did not even notice, did you.

If they only taxed personal retail sales -- the narrative they give suckers --the tax would need to be 89%.

In fact, they could do away with that "retail sales" part of the hustle, entirely.  Yes, they could.  Just pump up the impossible other taxes a bit.  They included tax on personal retail sales, so they could tell you they had a very simple personal retail sales tax.

Those fucking liars.  Well, yes, they have a retail sales tax, like your car has a trunk.   But only part of your car is a trunk. These bastards tried to give you the impression, it was ONLY a personal retail sales tax.  Not even fucking close.

Tea Party dumb asses are stupid, easily led by self confident liars, but even they would spot Fairtax fraud if they ONLY taxed city county and state operational and capital expenditures.

This kind of shit is hidden cleverly in deceptive ways, in their own documents they call research.  That's right, these bastards claim research, but that is actually not research, simply the place where they put the double speak crap.

So they do not have 22 million, or any, research about a simple personal retail sales tax to replace all other fed taxes.

How the hell is a massive tax on cancer, a "retail sales tax"?  Boortz said you will  "see your tax on your cash register receipt".    They give the fraudulent impression Fairtax is a retail sales tax. Fuck no it's not. They even cancer victims on Medicare, per Fairtax math and fine print, so that a destitute Medicaid patient would owe, without exception, 46,000 dollars in fed taxes if they "consumed"  200,000 dollars in goods and services, to fight cancer.

How they hell is that rational, or a personal retail sales tax? 


Fairtax math depends on such absurdities.

______________________________________________________________________



HOW GOOFY -- THIS GOOFY

They  have no research, as I will show, they have blantaly fraudulent "calculators" online which actually prevent you from knowing what they hell they tax, and the scam was apparently started by Scientologist as a fund raising fraud. 

Yes-- it sounds great. A very simple personal retail sales tax.  But as you will see, they have no research, they are not a simple personal retail sales tax,  and their leaders are not only frauds, but dishonest cowardly frauds. 

Yes, it sounds great, to stupid people, and those who don't bother to read the fine print, closely.

No, those Southern suckers in US, are not Scientologist.   But some Southern  hustlers, like Huckabee, found the slogans and lies PERFECT for their political  use.

So, they used it.  After all, it does sound great, and does claim 22 million in research.  Who would lie about that?

Well, Scientologist might, for one.  Hustlers, for another.  But these might not have technically lied, because of their amazing word games.  The result was an absurd bit of nonsense, balderdash, and they had no intention to pass it, but it could and did raise money for some of them.

Others adopted it -- like Tea Party folks and Mike Huckabee -- for political purposes. It sounds great to stupid people, and I was stupid too, for a while, until I read the fine print.











Gee --wonder why he didnt tell you then, the tax on all wage, pension, and operational expenditures, even capital expenditures?




____________________________________________________


TINY PROBLEM. The "TAX BASE". 

One tiny problem -- Fairtax has massive impossible other taxes, cleverly inserted in the fine print, that are impossible as hell.

They would need to tax retail sales 89% or so, if they only taxed personal retail sales.

In other words, if they did not, in their math, have massive taxes on all city county and state wage, pension, operational and capital expenditures, their 23% tax would have to be more like 50 or 55%.

Every impossible tax in Fairtax fine print is there for one reason, to make it seem like 23% tax would be enough.   They made damn sure they were dishonest as hell -- misleading as hell -- about what they tax.    And they did that, in documents about "tax base".


That's right, massive IMPOSSIBLE other taxes. Where do they have these taxes?  Are they not just a simple tax on retail sales, like they say?

They have these taxes -- which their math depends on -in clever but fraudulent ways.  Fraudulent meaning put in places, and language, that they intended would decieve you, not inform you.

They never say, anywhere, they "tax all cancer victims"  even the poorest.  They never say "our math is based on taxing all city county and states huge goofy taxes we know they can't and won't pay."

Instead, they created a "tax base"  -- a tax base is, by definition, what they tax.  Their documents about the tax base are clever, but President Bush Tax Panel, of course, had  no trouble decoding the bullshit.  If you know bullshit, and know their tax base documents, it's kind of a no brainer.   In clever deceptive language, a few words here, a few there, they do tell you, buried in piles of words and sentences that give you the opposite impression.


Like a cancer tax (a tax on all cancer victims, all accident victims, all nursing home residents, etc, without exception). All personal and government consumption, is in the tax base.  There is no exception for health care, cancer treatments, or the poor. 

Do they really expect a cancer victim on medicare will send in 23 or 46 thousand dollars? OF COURSE NOT.  They are not stupid. 

They are lying bastards.  

But they needed a "tax base" large enough on paper, so that a 23% tax would seem to work.  Remember, they never intended, and still do not intend, for Fairtax to pass.

This was designed by lying bastards Scientologist apparently, to raise money. 

Their math is based on that, meaning, their math is based on collecting 23% tax, on every cancer victim, from them personally, even the poor. Not on the price the cancer victim might pay -- but ON THEIR CONSUMPTION.






Health care is about 800 billion dollars in USA.  Fairtax math is based on collecting a 23% tax on every one of those 800 billion dollars, no exceptions whatsoever.



As you will see, Fairtax does tax retail sales --- that's not the problem.  The problem is, almost 2/3 of Fairtax taxes have nothing to do with normal retail sales taxes.  Like the cancer tax, the nursing home patient tax -- and much larger, the taxes on every city county and state, on all wage, pension, and capital investment expenditure. 



NO EXCEPTIONS



Fairtax slogans give the impression no poor person is taxed. 

Actually, in the fine print, they admit there are "no exceptions"   -- which is double talk, as you will see, for we tax "all expenditures" -personal and governmental.

Those few words "all expenditures"  personal and governmental "expenditures"  are clever as hell, and more importantly, those words are how the arrange their math.

Though Fairtax was exposed -- by President Bush Tax Advisory Panel, and by National Review, over ten years ago, Fairtax lying bastards saw an advantage to keep hustling it, keep fund raising for it, and some politicians saw it as a way to have a easy answer, to fool people with. Mike Huckabee once called Fairtax his "Magic Wand".

And it's all "researched?   Wanna fucking bet?  We show you their "research"  which has literally nothing to do with a simple retail sales tax,

Many of those listed ast "researchers"  had nothing to do with whatever the hell double speak they put out.  And others, like Dale  Jorgenson, is against Fairtax massive impossible taxes. 


But the way these fucking liars present the slogans and images, youi would think Harvard and Boston University were part of research into this 23% tax to replace all other fed taxes, including social security and medicare. Hell no.  In fact, Larry Kotlikoff  was paid by Fairtax to put out the spin -- we show his own documents, which cleverly insert these massive other taxes,

So no, Kotlikoff, the others, NEVER did research about a very simple personal retail sales tax that would replace all other fed taxes as I said. 


At every point, in every video, in every book, in every speech and video,  and in their own documents, Fairtax hustlers lied outright, and or used double speak bullshit, which we show you.


WHAT DO THEY TAX?

All personal and governmental EXPENDITURES, not sales, are in the "tax base".  Medicare expenditures are in the tax base.  Military expenditures,  are in the tax base.  City county and state wage, pension and capital investment expenditures, are in the tax base.

Tax base.  Tax base.  Look at their TAX BASE.  Only by adding military spending, all government wage, pension and capital spending, to the tax base, does their math add up.

In other words, only if they can collect 23% tax from Pentagon, and every city, every county, every state, on all expenditures -- not purchases, not retail sales -- does their math work.

The US runs a deficit--that does not matter.  Military spending is taxed, counted as revenue they will actually get.

Do you think the Pentagon will send in 200-400 billion as a tax?  And that the tresury will be able to spend it?   ITS ABSURD BULLSHIT, 

And remember, Fairtax bullshit math does not allow for exceptions, just because the government borrowed the money, and wont pay it back for 100 years.  The 23% tax is due NOW, without exception.

Remember -- Fairtax math is based on this pure fucking bullshit. 

Tax base is what they tax, by definition.

So, in the tax base, is the 200,000 spent on a woman with advanced cancer, who "consumes"  surgery, chemo, and rehab.  Yes, that 200K is in the "tax base"  as are all expenditures (the only exception is education expenditures, Fairtax "removed"  as they cleverly stated, education expenditures from the tax base.)

Indeed, that is how they arranged the deceptive math.

Their math is based on every cancer victim  paying 46,000 tax on 200,000 dollars of cancer surgery and rehab.

President Bush Tax Panel exposed all these goofy impossible other taxes, ten years ago, including the tax on Medicare patients.  Can Medicare patients actually pay 46,000 in tax, each on 200K in consumption of cancer goods and services?

Of course not.  But they had to include 2.1 Trillion in goofy impossible other taxes, in the fine print, to make their math add up.

So they did.





We will show  you.  And the best place to find where these lying bastards hid the fraud, is in their own documents. A few words here, a few there. 



In ONE document, on ONE page, they did tell you, they tax whatever NIPA defines as personal or government consumption expenditures.

So they did tell you.

Yes, everyplace else, 1000 videos, 10,000 speeches, endless bullshit sessions, endless nonsense, they told you Fairtax was a very simple tax on retail sales, to replace all other fed taxes.

Those lying pieces of shit. 

See 
  • Their fraudulent calculator trick
  • Their nonsense double speak they call research, but is the opposite 
  • Their slogans which sound great, none of which are true
  • Their fine print tricks. 

YES WE NEED A NEW TAX CODE

We do need a new tax code.  No one says otherwise.

And -- if passing this damn fraud is what it takes, GREAT.

I would love them to pass this fraud, mostly so the old code is gone, but also so show the dumb asses of the US how easily they care fooled by liars and con artists. 

Fairtax, however, is a special kind of con, fraud, hustle, in that the lying bastards who made it up, do not intend to pass it, but to raise money from stupid people.

As far as I can tell -- Fairtax was a Scientology hustle, according to Bruce Bartlett, who was approached to sell it. He refused.   It sounds SOOOOO great -- a very simple retail sales tax, all researched! 
Still if that's what we must do -- pass this Scientology fraud -- to get rid of our tax code completely, lets do that. It would be hilarious, and we may not be quite as stupid in the future, about this "wonderful"  slogan based frauds.


YES THE SLOGANS ARE GREAT


SIMPLE



TRANSPARENT



RESEARCHED

Their own documents -- if you can find them all -- show amazing things.  Not simple, not fair, not even rational.  Bizarre goofy other taxes, in the fine print.


 Oh yes, they have a retail sales tax, for a tiny part of Fairtax, but the other taxes are impossible gobbledygook, balderdash, bullshit, and they know it.


Why not just go with a retail sales tax, like they give the impression they do?

Because the tax rate would need to be 89%.   To make suckers think 23% tax would replace all other fed taxes, the lying bastards inserted massive-- yes massive -- other taxes in the fine print and math.




The other taxes are far far different from what they tell suckers in books, videos and speeches.  Such as huge impossible taxes on every city county and state, on all capital expenditures, on all police, fire, and operational expenditures.

Read their own damn "research" -- what these lying bastards call research anyway.  

 In their own "research" are goofy ass pieces of crap like this, their "assumption" that all city county and states will raise their tax rates. Hell no, they don't tell you how much all city county and states would have to raise taxes (we estimate about 40%).   


__________________________________________

And it was all researched -- 22 million in research!

Oh really?   All researched?    By who?  And where is it?

The research, as we show, is goofy nonsense, and is not -- repeat not ---about a simple retail sales tax of 23% to replace anything, much less replace all other fed taxes.



For example, Boortz and Fairtax web sites give you the impression Harvard "economist"  Dale Jorgenson proved all these great things about Fairtax.

Oh hell no.   In fact, Jorgenson reported that Fairtax could NOT work, and specifically reported workers would all have to donate or give their employers whatever they used to pay in taxes, and then theoretically,  prices COULD go down.

But that "donate your former income taxes" to your employer buffoonery, is not any any Fairtax book, video or speech.   Yet that's the theoretical only way for prices to drop, and Jorgenson did not even mention the insanity of the fraudulent fairtax calculator (see below) or equally fraudulent "prebate" nonsense (see below).

But Fairtax will still insist they are "the most researched plan in history"  never mind that they can't show one page of actual research about this very simple personal retail sales tax of 23% to replace all other fed taxes, in a revenue neutral fashion.

WHERE ARE THOSE TAXES ON CITY AND STATES IN THE RESEARCH?

Fairtax massive taxes on city and states ARE in the fine print, but not in any research. Remember, they  have no fucking research, what they call research is the double talk fraud.

So no, of course they did not "research" if the Pentagon will pay 200 billion a year, or NYC will pay a billion. They knew the entire fucking time, from the word go, this was bullshit fraud.

Like their document "TAXING SALES".   Even that is deliberately vague, even that gives the opposite impression of taxing sales, but they will put a few words in, that is so misleading you may not even notice, if you could find it.



This is what research is -- above.  And how we use the word "research"  in our 50K offer.   

Fairtax liars on the other hand, use "research"  to be any document they hired others to do, that obfuscates and misleads.   That is not research, that is part of the fraud, the deliberate misleading bullshit.

---------------------------------------------------------


See for yourself.

Here is Fairtax "research"  document about state and local government getting a fee -- a very small fee -- for collecting the tax on themselves, for wages and benefits.    They never admit candidly they even tax all wages and pensions and expenditures, this is as close as they come. 
So they admit a "fee" is paid, but never tell you candidly about these massive taxes on wages, pensions, capital investments and operational expenditures.

What the fuck?





Even then, they name the document "TAXING SALES"   which gives you the impression they are taxing sales. Hell no, they are taxing much much more than retail sales. 



_________________________________

Boortz and Huckabee sold  the fraud.  Boortz was paid.

FOX NEWS sold the fraud, early on, so did Grover Norquest.   A number of politicians sold it too, Orin Hatch, Grassley from Iowa.  It sounded so good. 

A very very simple retail sales tax -- and that tax did not matter, because you got a check every month, to pay your taxes on "necessities".    No one, they told us hundreds of times, would ever be taxed on "the necessities"  because of that prebate check every legal citizen got, every month.


Lying bastards.  While they told you no one would be taxed on necessities, in the "tax base"  and cleverly put elsewhere, every cancer victim would owe 30,000 dollars or so, on 100,000 in cancer surgery and chemo.

That's the tax base -- remember that.  The tax base is, as they told you in one document, one paragraph (in their research) all expenditures, personal and governmental.  Elsewhere they tell you another important phrase --it's taxed, "without exception".

And another important phrase, tucked away " the person using or consuming the good or service is liable for the tax imposed".

So, if you bother to connect they dots -- which they made very hard to do -- it does tell you.

And -- you no longer pay Social Security taxes.  As if magically so much money will come in, no one, and no employer, has to pay one dime of Social Security.  Not one dime!

 But Social Security provides 800 billion dollars in revenue.   That's just gone, completely gone.   Any explanation what replaces that 800 billion??

No.

And if that were not goofy enough, these lying bastards have a doozy of any entitlement, GOING OUT.  720 billion goes OUT, and get this -- they do not county this as an expense.  It's magically free.  All these checks they send out, don't worry, it's not an expense!



Do they really expect to send out 720 billion or more a year in prebates?

No. But it sounded good.  And they had to make up some shit like this, or you could say, "Well, how will grandma pay those taxes on nursing home and health care"    

They have a goofy fraudulent answer.  Don't worry -- we have the PREBATE. But the prebate is about 200 a month, each person.

That does not go up, at all, if you have cancer. Or if you have heart surgery. You get 200  a month.

_________________________________


Good luck paying 40,000 in fed taxes on your cancer surgery and chemo, with 200 a month.

Yet -- Fairtax suckers did not even notice. Why?  Because they believed it was all researched.   Nothing this goofy could get by the researchers, right?

Wrong, their "research"  is where the fraud is. 

Do they really expect to tax every city county and state, 23% on their wage, pension and capital expenditures?

_________________________________


One problem with Fairtax, it is SOOOO goofy, it's hard to believe anyone would try to sell this nonsense.   They didn't sell the fine print, they sold slogans.  


Remember that, the slogans sounded great.  

The fine print was hard to find.

_________________________________



NO PREBATE TO CITIES COUNTIES AND STATES

 Cities, counties and states would be massively taxed, over 1 trillion.

Do they get a prebate?  No.  So Fairtax did not even bother concocting double talk for a prebate of 200 a month for them.

In fact, Fairtax never tells you, the prebate is about 200 a month, and is not flexible.  Everyone gets the same amount,  and supposedly it pays for the tax on "all necessities".

It would not even pay the federal tax on your rent, for one month.

But they sold it as paying all your taxes on "necessities".


_________________________________


We noticed, and so did President Bush Tax Advisory Panel.

President Bush Tax Advisory panel noticed all these  frauds --  by that we mean, all the goofy other impossible taxes -- because they read the fine print, all of it.

You can see the fraud, too, if you take the time to read all the fine print, in all their documents, very carefully.

 Especially the documents about their TAX BASE, their "calculator"  and their definitions. 

_________________________________________________

PROOF OF FRAUD
NOT MISTAKEN -- LYING BASTARDS....

To us, the proof of fraud, rather than just being mistaken, by Fairtax hustlers, is the "calculator"  fraud.

These bastards put up a "calculator"  which supposedly "Dared to compare"  the income tax and fairtax.    We show you that trick.

The trick is, briefly, the lying bastards never allowed you to put into the calculator, anything about your consumption!!   No earthly way to enter, into their calculator, anything about what you "consumed". See how slick these bastards are....






__________________________________________

Sneaky ass fine print tricks, sneaky ass "tax base"  and a sneaky ass "calculator"  fraud.

All deliberate -- not accidental, not by mistake, but a contrived, planned, and paid for (they paid others to do these frauds for publication).  

Is it really a fraud, if in the fine print, they do tell you, however deceptively,  however contrary to their over all statements to the contrary?   Hell yes, it's a fraud, in the meaning of "fraud" as we use it -- language deliberately intended to deceive, not inform. 



So it's far far more than a few "fine print tricks".   It's a concerted, decade long (or more) effort to raise money from suckers, for this goofy but great sounding fraud.  

We do not know who paid who, how much. We wish we did know.  But we know they were paid.

Beacon Hill, a company that sold the fraud through deceptive "documents" -- the ones with the most clever fine print tricks -- were paid, and they are well aware Fairtax sold itself as a very simple personal retail sales tax.  The narrative in their documents gives that impression.   But the details in what they brazenly, and fraudulently call "research"  is quite different.

Was it lying if they used "assumptions"  and definition tricks, that were inserted to mislead, while maybe technically truthful, as some would argue?  Yes, we consider it lying, to give a false narrative, such as the title of one of their "research" pieces -- "Taxing Sales, What Rate Works".

In "Taxing Sales"  they have billions of dollars of taxes on things that are not sales, like government wage and pension expenditures.   But they title the document "TAXING SALES".    Think that was accidental?  Hell no, it was not accidental.    They had to know, and had to be told, to make it appear one way, in casual reading, but in the footnotes, and distorted contrived double talk, and math, there is quite something else. 

 Neal Boortz was paid to write the Fairtax Book, and then an even more fraudulent  "Answering the critics"  book, where he sure as hell did NOT answer the critics who knew the fraud. 

He just made up his own "critics" and then repeated his fraud.

That's right, Boortz wrote a book "answering the critics" and made damn sure he didn't mention one word from the critics who knew the fraud.

Like the critics, such as me and Bush Tax Panel, who knew and showed the impossible 2.1 trillion dollars in other taxes, Fairtax has in the fine print.

That's right, Fairtax has 2.1 Trillion dollars of "other taxes" on top of, in addition to, the 1.4 trillion in retail sales taxes.  In fact, so goofy are these other taxes, that if they simply raised those other taxes, they would not need the retail sales tax at all.

The retail sales tax is there, only to make you believe, that's all they tax, retail sales. Hell, that's only a small part of Fairtax.  The massive other taxes are in the fine print.

For example, if your city "expends"  4 million on fireman and police pay and benefits, your city would owe almost 1 million dollars as a tax to the federal government.

Did you know that?  



It's in their math. Their math is based on this, and other absurdities

Massive taxes -- on wage, pensions, and operational expenditures -- paid by every city, county and state.  We show you the fine print.

And remember, their math is based on it. 

So cleverly are these "other taxes" in the fine print and math, that you can easily miss it, in fact, you have to check the math very closely, as President Bush Tax Panel did, when they exposed this fraud, in a polite way.

  And we show you below, the fine print. 

Their fine print is always clever as hell, a few words here, there, but it's there. And their math, the "tax base" is based on those fraudulent, misleading, goofy fine print tricks. 








Here you see a Fairtax sucker explain their tax base --- in trillions of dollars.   Retail sales are only about 32-40% of that.  Like all Fairtax suckers,  he assumed US had 11.4 Trillion in retail sales. Oh hell no. That 11.4 trillion at the bottom includes all Medicare spending (therefore taxed)  all state and local and federal government spending (therefore taxed),

These lying pieces of shit went to great lengths to fool you.  


Most people who saw such a table would think, Oh, I see, US retail sales were 11 trillion.  Nonsense.  Retail sales were far far less that 11 trillion.  But they needed that 11 or 12 trillion, so that a 23 or 30% tax on that "consumption"  would make sense to suckers.

So they added up all kinds of shit -- like all cancer surgery, all health care, all government wage and pension expenditures, to get that very high "consumption" figure.

_____________________________________ 
Fairtax was never designed to pass -- it's not a tax code, at all.  It's political theater, designed by Scientologist to raise money.  Yes, it was.  And some of them, STILL raise money from suckers.

_____________________________________ 

So, get rid of our entire tax code, keep not one page, not one word.

And if installing the fraudulent, goofy, scientology hustle, is the only way to get a new tax code -- fine.   Put in the fraud. 

 We can laugh at it, ask the liars why they pushed it, and get  new tax code, then .    Even a fraud -- which we can correct -- is better than what we have now.


INCREASE IN TAXES AT ALL LEVELS.

We show you the very clever "assumption"  in one of their sneaky documents, that has huge tax increases in all levels, a basic assumption.    

It's there -- see it yourself. We show it, again. 



Did Boortz, or Huck, or anyone, ever mention the over trillion dollars of taxes on wages, pensions, capital investments, etc?

   No.

  Did they tell you in any book, video or speech, about the "assumption"  that all city county and states will raise their tax rates to pay that?

No. 

And that's just the start of the things they did not tell you, in any book, any video, any speech.


Since we need a new tax code anyway   --- if it takes passing a fraud to get rid of this bogus tax code we have, fine.   

Please keep that in mind --- I want Fairtax to pass.  I think it would be hilarious, and a great way to expose the frauds behind it.



Like goofy high taxes on every city, every county, and every state.  The nearly 1 billion dollar tax on NYC, for example, the 900 million dollar tax on Los Angles.  The 120 million dollar tax on St. Louis.   Fairtax taxes all wage, pension, and capital investment expenditures, of every city, every county and every state.

Did they ever tell you -- even hint - that California state assembly would owe over 20 billion?

Hell no.

But in their OWN documents, cleverly as hell, fraudulently as  hell, are these taxes.    You have to understand how tricky these bastards are, in the fine print, but as President Bush Tax Panel found, these massive other taxes are the basis of Fairtax.

The retail sales tax -- remember that - is not the problem.  The problem are these huge, goofy, impossible other taxes, inserted by lying bastards to make their math work, on paper.

You can see it-- cleverly inserted in their own documents.  But they never tell you about it, in books, videos and speeches.  

Their own document


You probably would never even find these other documents, but we did.  Read them very closely, notice above?  NIPA lists government" consumption"  and remember, Fairtax said everything NIPA has as a consumption or expenditure by government is "in the tax base".

That means they tax it. 

Remember that -- whatever is in the tax base, by defintion, they tax 23%.

Retail sales are in the tax base, so they are taxed.

But also, all government expenditures, are in the tax base, (other than education expenditures).  So all government wages to police, firemen, all prison expenditures, even all defense spending (really)  is in the tax base.

An audacious bit of bullshit -- they tax the federal government on all war expenditures, all pension expenditures, even all NASA expenditures.   No, they do NOT just tax retail sales.

RETAIL SALES TAX WOULD BE 89%

If they only taxed retail sales, the tax rate would be 89%.   That is the 600 pound gorilla in the room.   So they just told you they tax retail sales, but they also tax those impossible other things, like all cancer victims, even cancer victims on medicare.

They tax all city county and state governments.

They even tax the fed government on all their expenditures -- no, not just on their retail purchases, but on ALL EXPENDITURES other than education.

Read it CLOSELY. Read their fine print CLOSELY.  In fact, Neal Boortz did tell you -- but then made it seem like it was just a tax on federal government for retail sales. Very clever.  

"All sales at the retail level, whether to individuals or the government, will be subject to the tax".

He "forgot" to mention the fact, which we show in their fine print and math, that also taxed is all other expenditures. The only "exception"  is education expenditures.  But all other expenditures are taxed, and that's how their math adds up.



Remember that -- what they put in the "tax base"  means they tax it.

If root canals are in the tax base (they are, along with all cancer care and surgery) it's taxed, without exception. 

And you have to understand how clever these lying bastards were -- and they did it, but tricky ass, fraudulent words, about their tax base.

But at least it's there -- if you are smart enough to read it. 


______________________________________

NO ONE TOLD YOU YOUR CITY WOULD BE TAXED 20-50 million dollars.  Did they?

Hell no.  In fact, Boortz made sure you thought retail sales would be taxed, only.  He never said ONLY retail sales.  Very clever, and typical, of lying bastards.

Even small cities, small counties, would owe 20 to 50 million in taxes on their "expenditure" of wages, pensions and capital expenditures.

Try to grasp how goofy that is, then grasp, these lying bastards never told you about it, except in very clever, very deceptive double speak.  But that's how their math adds up. 

How Fairtax sold itself.... a very simple personal retail sales tax.  The slogans all sound great.

Better than great.   All prices drop.  Just pay the same price you always did, and the savings from the Fairtax will not only make American "the envy of the world"  and "increase business spending 27% the first year ...

 MORE MONEY FOR EVERYONE...

Everyone working gets an immediate increase of take home pay, Neal Boortz said, of 50%.   Prices all drop. Pay goes up.     The only problem will be where to put the money.

Wow, a lying bastard can make you believe anything, if you don't know the facts.





Pay goes up!   Prices come down.  Transparent!!

Just a "very very simple retail sales tax".

Those fucking liars.  None of that, absolutely none of their slogans are remotely true.  In fact, quite the opposite.  But you have to see the fine print, closely, to know what lying bastards they are.



By definition, a tax base is what they tax.


That may not jump out at you, as source of their fraud, until you detangle what the hell "NIPA" is.

You probably could  not find this document anyway.  They put it online, in documents very cleverly, and fraudulently (misleading on purpose) to make you think this is something about a sales tax on retail sales.

Oh hell no.


Do you know what NIPA is?  It's got absolutely nothing to do with taxes.  You might as well say, our tax base is based on every third number in the New York Phone book. 

Fairtax is goofy as that. So no, they did NOT say we base our tax base on every third number in NYC phone book.  Even Fairtax suckers would spot that.

So they gave you some double speak about "all personal and governmental expenditures" in the NIPA documents. It's as fucking silly and idiotic as using the NYC phone book.  And yes, they knew that. But the "expenditures"  in NIPA documents sounded better, since 99.99% of people have no fucking clue what NIPA documents are, much less what they list as consumption.  

And Fairtax made sure they included even more bullshit, like all government expenditures, including military expenditures. Do you really fucking think the Pentagon is going to send in 800 billion dollars?  

Here is a table they put out.  Notice, there is nothing in there about retail sales.   If Fairtax only taxed personal retail sales, they would list "personal retail sales" and that tax rate would have to be 89%.

________________________________
 They showed  you -- in a fraudulent way -- their tax base.   We show it again, smaller. 


But what is actually in those numbers above?

All personal expenditures -- far far greater than all personal retail purchases.

But they did tell you - if you found that one  page, in an online document.  YOu don't find that in their books, their videos or their speeches.  But, they did tell you, sorta kinda, in a lying way.


All governmental expenditures (other than educational expenditures).

Notice anything?   That means, military spending is in the tax base. City county and state capital expenditures are in the tax base.  Your city has to pay massive taxes on wage and pension EXPENDITURES. 

Yes, that's how their math adds up.

 But they did sorta tell you, in a clever way. Absurd bullshit, of course, but they told you in a fraudulent -- misleading -- way.

Medicare expenditures? Yes, and the medicare PATIENT would owe 23% tax on anything good or services they consumed.  A 23, 000 dollar fed tax, on "consumption"  of cancer surgery and chemo costing 100,000.   

Yes, that's how their math adds up.

Yes, and much much more.  And remember, a tax base, by definition, is what they tax.
________________________________

The retail sales tax is not the problem.  Their massive impossible other taxes -- quite impossible, quite goofy -- are the problem. 

 And it was exposed long ago, politely.

We expose it -- not so polite. 

__________________________________

Their own document



A simple retail sales tax. All researched. Replaces all other fed taxes. Uh, not so much. Not even close.

________________________________________________

WHO WOULD BOTHER TO LIE ABOUT THAT RESEARCH?

SIMPLE.  CLEAR.  NO TRICKS. 

You can check the research. Eighty "top economist" designed or vetted Fairtax, they claimed.


Oh really?  You fucking liars. No one vetted Fairtax,  though some suckers were fooled by the slogans.




Fairtax hustlers have two things in common --self confidence, and Slogans.   Slogans, given by self confident hustlers, are seductive as hell.   Huckabee said Fairtax was a tax God would approve of  -- if he were President,  Huck said, he would just "wave the magic wand" of Fairtax.

Only IRS agents or lobbyist would be against it.

_______________________________________

Actually, Fairtax lying bastards are against it, which is why they don't really want to pass this  horseshit nonsense.  But it sounds great to stupid people, and  those fooled by the slogans.

Fairtax lying bastards raise money on it, and do have a few suckers working for them "volunteers".   But the money always goes to the hustlers. We name them, below.  Remember this, they raise money on it.

Yes, Fairtax hustle was invented to raise money -- Scientologist apparently started it, see below.

The retail part of Fairtax is the tiny part. Most of Fairtax taxes are impossible bullshit, literally impossible.   But it sounds great. 



Most of Fairtax has NOTHING to do with personal retail sales.
2.1 Trillion dollars of their projected revenue is utter nonsense, -- which is why they hid it.

Remember -- the retail sales tax in Fairtax is not the problem.  The problem is, the biggest part of Fairtax are impossible goofy hidden taxes.  They had to include those impossible taxes, to make the math work. 




William Gale, President Bush Tax Panel Chairman, had no trouble spotting the goofy fraud.   He showed that without the silly double talk and deceptive impossible other taxes in their fine print, Fairtax would need to be 89%, not 23%



The guy Neal Boortz told suckers did most of the "research"  --- did not research on Fairtax as Boortz described, and said Fairtax would not work.



DO YOU THINK THEY WILL SEND IT IN?

One tiny example of Fairtax bullshit -- their fine print would have a 200,000 dollar tax,  that Mesquite Arizona would have to pay, just as a tax on the wages "expended"  to these  men. Overall, this city could owe over 20 million dollars in "expenditure taxes"  to the fed government.

It's in the fine print.


Do you think Mesquite AZ is going to send in 200,000 to the fed gov, and millions more, for these clever bullshit impossible taxes, hidden in their fine print?


Hell no Mesquite AZ is not going to send it in.  That's pretty much what all other fairtax taxes are like - impossible bullshit, and they knew it was impossible, so they hid this shit as well as they could.

It's in the fine print.

Nor will NYC send in almost a billion, Chicago won't send in 600 million, St. Louis will not send int 140 million, on and on.

Remember, Fairtax lying bastards have never told anyone about this candidly.  But that's the biggest part of Fairtax fraud -- the huge, massive taxes on city county and states.

It's how fairtax works -- in other words, Fairtax is a goofy fraud by lying bastards. 




This is the guy , Kotlikoff, that was "well paid"  according to Bruce Bartlett, to write Fairtax bullshit.   Technically, you could was Kotlikoff didnt lie,  because of his clever absurd assumptions and definition tricks.  Lying is not research.  Lying is lying. 






Think Saint Louis will send in 160 million dollars because these bastards put impossible "assumptions" in the fine print?

If so, you are a perfect Fairtax sucker.




Hustler Huckabee makes suckers think pimps and prostitutes would pay. Actually, 2.1 trillion dollars of Fairtax fraud has nothing to do with retail sales taxes. 

A retail sales tax on personal consumption. That's what their web sites said, that's all the examples they gave.   22 million dollars of research.   Who would lie about this?

Well, we show you some that got paid, to push Fairtax. Plus, politicians used it to give them a "easy answer" -- just use this magic wand. Never mind it's a fraud.



The "TAX BASE TRICK"

Neal said Fairtax is a "very very simple"  personal retail sales tax, with 22 million dollars of "independent research". 

The "most researched plan in history"  Boortz said. With a straight face, he told suckers -- "the only problem will be where to put the money."

But that's not what their own documents say. Their own official documents show they tax whatever NIPA defines as personal or governmental "consumption expenditures"

Then when you chased down what NIPA is, and what they define as consumption expenditures, you see retail sales are only a tiny part of that. All medical care, is part of what they tax, no exceptions whatsoever.

There is no exception for Medicare patients, or medical consumption.   That is all taxed -- and must be to make their math work.

Every part, every iota, of lies by Fairtax hustlers, is to make their math add up.  To make their math add up, they had to tax one hell of a lot more than retail sales.

And they had to tax a hell of a lot more than "natural persons".  Yes, they tax "persons"  but they also tax every city county and state.  They even tax the federal government on it's wage and pension expenditure.   They actually count the taxes on the federal government as spendable monies.

So it's  horse shit. If you can tax the government,  this way, you don't need to tax people at all. And yes, Fairtax lying bastards know it, but they had to make their math work somehow.




THE BASIC HUSTLE:  THEIR TAX BASE.


A tax base is  -- by definition -- what they tax. And oh yeah, all city county and states are supposed to raise their tax rates!

Cleverly, they admit in a slick way, they have massive taxes on city county and states, as a 23% tax on wages, pensions, and capital expenditures. 

How are cities, states, counties, supposed to pay these huge taxes?  They tell you here -- raise all tax rates.

Virtually anything a city, county state "expend" - - they have to pay 23%  tax!!!

Much of it, in advance.    Then, they cleverly add in another place, they "assume"  city and states should raise their tax rates to pay it.




ITS THERE -- IN BLACK AND WHITE.

Still, they do have a few words here, a few there, that tell you. Quite opposite of the narrative, quite opposite of the bullshit slogans, quite opposite of everything else they put on paper, they have these massive good impossible taxes.




By definition, they tax whatever is in the "tax base".  

All cancer consumption is in the tax base. All surgery. All chemo. All everything.   Everything is "in the tax  base"  except foreign travel and education wage expenditures.

City county and states -- even the federal government -- must pay massive taxes.  That's goofy as hell, only in the fine print, and impossible.

_____________________________________

THIS BLOG SUCKS -- FINE.


People tell me this blog sucks -- yes, it probably does. Im not a web site maker, Im just a guy that was fooled by these lying bastards, and now show their fraud.







On the other hand, the lying bastards have spent a lot of money on their fraud -- including the fraudulent "Fairtax calculator" piece of shit, that they spent  40K or more on.   Just the calculator fraud, by itself, should alert you to the fact, these bastards are really lying -- not mistaken. 


Check out proof these lying bastards have a "calculator" that literally made it impossible for you to know what Fairtax taxes.


And the added fact they have no research, but claim 22 million dollars worth, is the icing on the cake.  If you gave these bastards any money,  you can get it back, I bet -- just sue them.   They will likely cough up the money very quickly.

_________________________________________________

Boortz's books on "Fairtax Critics".



 Boortz made up his own "critics"  and then repeated his slogans. He sure as hell did not show the critics that knew his fraud, and exposed the massive impossible other taxes.

He could not mention that -- you would see the massive impossible taxes on all city, county, and states, and the equally goofy impossible taxes on the poor.

You would also see  Fairtax fraudulent calculator.

But Boortz wrote an entire book, answering critics he either made up entirely, or folks who saw huge problems, even though they didn't study the fine print, like President Bush Tax Panel did. 

Yes, we read Boortz's books.  And we read the fine print, and the "research"  fraud by Boortz and others.

By fine print, we mean the written details in Fairtax documents that their own supporters -- even "educated"  supporters -  never knew existed.   

A few words here, a few words there, and the lying bastards make a Scientology fraud look like a wonderful economic plan.

I WAS FOOLED BY THESE BASTARDS

Yes, they fooled me,  for a while.  Until I read the fine print.  

All that research!!  Twenty two million dollars worth!! Who would lie about that?



Do you think Dallas Texas is going to send in 180 million dollars as a tax on their wage, pension, and capital investment expenditures?

Remember, Fairtax never tells anyone about these massive other taxes, in any candid way. Quit the opposite. Fairtax lying bastards HID -- we show you where -- the massive other taxes in clever fine print, and math, a few words here, a few there. 

 NoTexas city county or state official has any idea Fairtax would tax Dallas 180 million dollars -- it's quite a trick to unravel the nonsense from their math, but we show you the math, and fine print.

It was not that hard for President Bush Tax Panel to spot the frauds -- the massive impossible other taxes -- but they eat fine print tricks for breakfast, and spit them out for lunch.

Fairtax lying bastards DELIBERATELY obfuscated -- lied -- by this clever technique of hiding a few words here, there, and using double speak.  In their books, videos, and speeches, they gave a drastically different view of their "very very simple"   personal retail sales tax.


In one sense, they DID tell you, if you found all the fine print, laid it out, carefully went over each word, each footnote, and each tax table.   But even then, they did that in a way to intentionally fool you.  That's fraud -- in our opinion, that is how we define fraud.  That's what we mean when we say they are lying bastards, and this is a goofy fraud.


Who started Fairtax hustle?

Who wrote the fine print in Fairtax?   According to Bruce Bartlett, President Reagan's advisor, he was approached to help sell Fairtax, by Scientologist.   See more about that below.

Don't believe Fairtax actually taxes all city county and states 23% tax on all wage, pension, and capital investment expenditures?

They sure as hell do, and their math depends on it.



Fairtax never says anything clearly in one place, of course.

But look at all their documents, as President Bush Tax Panel did.  Look at the math, as Bush Tax Panel did.

As you will see, Fairtax would need to be 89%, per President Bush Tax Panel, if they only taxed retail sales.

To make it SEEM like they could have a 23% tax, to replace all other fed taxes, Fairtax lying bastards lied their asses off -- cleverly.

Fairtax sounds great -- but is so goofy, when you understand the fine print, that you realize, they never intended to pass it, at all. 

Scientologist made money SELLING this -- a fund raising scam. Yes, it was.   And still is. Scientologist, or former Scientologists, are still making money raising money.   

HOW IT'S A FRAUD IN THE FINE PRINT.

The fine print they wrote so you never likely even see it,  unless you find all their documents, and read each of those very closely.

  Importantly, the fine print is drastically different than the slogans.  

For example, the slogans give you the impression they have a "very very simple" tax, paid at "the point of  purchase".    As you will see, most of Fairtax has nothing to do with retail point of purchase.

So why was Boortz pushing the "simple retail sales tax" bullshit?  Because he was paid. We don't know who paid him, but he was paid.  Find out who paid him, if you can. 



BUT THEY TELL YOU-- HIDDEN IN THE BS 

Ive yet to meet a Fairtax sucker that didn't insist out the ass they read "ever word" of HR 25.  And of course, they read Neal Boortz's fraudulent Fairtax Book.

But ask them what Fairtax taxes -- they give you the SLOGANS.   Never, ever, the fine print.

For example, not one Fairtax sucker ever has a clue of the massive taxes on city county and states -- for wage, pension and operational expenditures.  Chicago Illinois, for example, would owe over 200 million dollars.   Don't you think Chicago should know?

And in the fine print, Fairtax "assumes"  Chicago will raise it's tax rates by 200 million. Read it -- really. Read it close.  If you read it very close, it does tell you, a few words here, in clever ways, and a few words there.







DISTRACTING ---

When you read Fairtax HR25, you can have no earthly idea --it is impossible -- to know what the hell they are talking about.   Not difficult, but impossible.

But it all sounds so -- well - legal, so smart.  It's all bullshit, as you will see.

They tell you they tax all "consumption"  but there is no way for you to know what the consumption means -- for example, no way for you to realize, from HR25, they mean wage pension and capital investment, operational expenditures, are taxed. All city, all county, all state governments would owe staggeringly high taxes -- and then they are supposed to raise their tax rates to pay it.

That's in their clever other documents. 


Why do they sell Fairtax as a "point of purchase"  retail sales tax?   Because they know such bullshit impresses stupid people. Wow, stupid people say to themselves, "point of purchase" -- these guys are so smart.

Still pass this fraud -- it would be hilarous!  Really, pass it.  I am not against Fairtax, I actually want Fairtax to pass, so we finally learn the lesson about lying bastards and their hustles.

Like the reference to "NIPA" defined consumption.   Do you even know what NIPA is?  At all?

Fairtax tells you, IF you find that particular document, and then find, in other documents, other places, other footnotes, what the hell that could mean.

That "NIPA" reference is not in any book, not even hinted at, in any speech,  not even alluded to, in any video.  But it's central to what they tax.

 Why not say -- "Folks, we tax everything in N NIPA tax tables, and here is what that means?
Hell no, they are not going to say that, it gives away the fraud. 

So they put it in a few words here, a few words there. 

What the fuck is NIPA??

No, it's impossible.  But as you will see, Fairtax math and fine print has 2 trillion dollars of these kinds of goofy impossible taxes.


CONTACTED RESEARCHERS

We contacted a dozen "researchers"  and "educated" supporters of Fairtax.

We found an entirely different story -- namely, there is no actual research whatsoever.   There are a lot of slogans, deceptive bullshit double speak,  but no research.

Only one person -- who actually worked for Fairtax writing the hustle in his own documents -- even knew what Fairtax fine print had it in.  And he should know -- he wrote that fraud.

But was it fraud?  He did put in massive impossible other taxes, goofy assumptions, tricky double speak, inane but dressed up definitions.  He did a very good job of making bullshit hustle seem erudite, and he was paid for that. 


But is there any actual research -- is there 22 million dollars of research into this "very very simple" personal retail sales tax?   Hell no, there is  not. 

And we offer 50K to anyone who can show one page of that 22 million dollars of research, into this very very simple personal retail sales tax, to replace all other fed taxes.

So -- we put our money where our mouth is.    Notice- Fairtax lying bastards never do that.  Spouting bullshit -- but never backing it up.


EXPOSED ALREADY 

Fairtax was exposed by President Bush Tax Panel as a fraud, over ten years ago, in polite, academic terms.   We show you.  

But we are not polite.  

Just one "tiny" example -- the 30,000 fed tax, that this cancer patient would owe, personally, without exception, per fairtax fine print, and math.

Don't you think they should make it clear, that no matter who pays for your cancer surgery, chemo, nursing home care, whatever medical consumption you encounter, YOU are personally liable. No, your insurance would not be liable, specifically Fiartax fine print (and math) is based on every cancer victim, every stroke victim, rich poor, whatever, actually paying 23% of consumption


Can a cancer victim on Medicare, pay 30K in fed tax on her cancer "consumption"?  

This cancer tax is the tip of the absurdity, but they had to do it.  Why?  Because such absurdities is the only way they could get their fraudulent math to "add up".

CITIES TAXED ON WAGES AND PENSION EXPENDITURES, AND MUCH MORE.

 The massive taxes on city county and states, for their wage "expenditures." Even small cities spend 10 to 20 million dollars a year on fire and police protection, sewers libraries, court houses.

Yet for every 10 million dollars your city "expends" - read the fine print and math, it's there, based on it -- your city owes 2.3 million dollars to the fed government.

Sound like a personal retail sales tax to you?


Which is why President Bush Tax Panel found the huther rather easily  -- but they did not pay attention to Fairtax slogans.  They only went by the fine print and math.

And they claimed 22 million dollars of research proved this absurdity. No, they have no proof of the absurdity, they just have slogans.

Which is why, for five years now, I keep offering -- show 1 page of that 22 million in research. Should be easy.  





BUSLLHIT DOCUMENTS 
ARE NOT
RESEARCH

Fairtax does have documents -- lots of them. We show you some.   But those documents are the fraud, they have the massive goofy impossible other taxes, in those documents.

They have no real research about a very simple personal retail sales tax to replace all other fed taxes.  They have slogans -- yes.  They have bullshit. But they don't have a damn penny's worth of actual "research".

And they sure as  hell don't have 22 million dollars of research about a "very very simple personal consumption tax."


In fact, most of Fairtax has NOTHING to do with a personal retail sales tax.   Most of Fairtax taxes are goofy impossible taxes they hide in the fine print, to make their math work.


Lying your ass off in your slogans, then telling suckers you have 22 million dollars of research, is the basic Fairtax fraud.


  WHAT THE HELL IS NIPA?

Fairtax OWN documents tell you they tax whatever NIPA defines as personal or governmental "consumption expenditures".

 NIPA tables  have nothing to do with taxes.  All cancer surgery, chemo, all city county and state wage expenditures -- even all federal spending, city county and state expenditures, are "in the tax base".



President Bush Tax Panel simple read the fine print -- and didn't give a fuck what the slogans were.



They found -- as did we -- pages like this.... put out by Fairtax sneaky bastards.  So yes, they DID tell you, in a few words, in documents here and there, but they arranged the words to fool you, to lie to you, not to inform you.

And yes, it was deliberate lying, deliberate deception, deliberate bullshitting. 







How the hell is a cancer victim who makes 20K a year, supposed to pay 50K or 30K in fed taxes?

Fairtax is not worried about that.  They just wanted their math to add up.  They never had any intention to pass their own fraud.

They raised money on the fraud from suckers. 


And how the hell is it a "retail sales tax" when Fairtax taxes all city, county and states, on all expenditures -- including all wage, pensions, operational and capital investment expenditures.

How the hell is it a "retail sale"  when a cancer victim -- on Medicare- - gets cancer surgery?   Do you think Medicare is going to pay a tax to the fed gov?

No -- and Fairtax does not ever explain the absurdity, because they can not, of the fed government paying itself massive taxes. 


Neal Boortz was surprised by a question about cancer victim paying taxes.  Boortz replied as if this was not a problem   --  yes, even cancer is taxed. "We can't play favorites"  Boortz said.  But  how will a cancer victim pay?

Oh don't worry Boortz said, as if the question was silly  "We will save her so much, the tax won't matter".

WTF?   A woman with cancer would owe 30 or 40 thousand in taxes,  just because she got sick? 

And no, Fairtax won't save her a fucking dime.

Some Fairtax suckers insist the cancer victim  wont have to pay, her insurance company will.   Actually, the fine print tells you -- the person using or consuming goods or services is liable, without exception.

And the millions of uninsured would simply not have an insurance company to pay anything.  This is part of Fairtax bullshit word games.

Yes, they do tax all this consumption,  and more.  It's in their fine print and math.   Cleverly -- in a way you could not possibly realize your city, your county, and your state, would all owe massive taxes on their operational expenditures!

Operate a police department? All such "expenditures"  are in the tax base.



Notice the trick above?  The sneaky bastards title is "Taxing Sales Under Fairtax-- What rate works".

First of all if they ONLY taxed sales, the tax rate would need to be 89%.   But you would have no earthly clue about that, from their narrative.  But it is there -- if you could find it. 

They did list a line -- Government consumption spending.   They don't make it clear this includes capital investments (like building a court house) and operating a fire department.  But it does.  

Capital investments are taxed -- IN ADVANCE.

SO if your city builds a new 20 million dollar library -- your city has to pay almost 4 million dollars in fed taxes.  That would of course -- yes -- make that 20 million dollar library cost 24 million.

And guess what?  Fairtax cleverly admits that in a footnote. Yes, they do -- if you can even find the document.

We show you...




Fairtax adopts a "prepay approach"  to taxing government investment (like capital expenditures) since much of the consumption generated by government investment would otherwise never be taxed".

That's a very skilled bit of bullshit, that sentence -- as if there is a bunch of mysterious consumption generated by government investment that they need to get.  Actually, they need all government expenditures  in the tax base -- because otherwise, they would have to admit a personal retail sales tax would be 89%.

But they were not about to explain their fraud, in their own footnote.


Boortz typical trick, if he ever even mentions a city has to pay Fairtax, will be to imply the tax is on their retail purchases.

Oh hell no. Oh fuck no.   The math is based on all cities, all counties, all states, paying HUGE taxes on essentially everything they expend.   Yes, they would pay retail sales tax, but the massive other taxes they would pay, are several million times more than that.

Gee -- I wonder why Boortz never made that clear?

___________________________________


WHY

Why should a cancer victim pay 30 or 50 thousand in fed taxes, just because she got sick?

She should not have to pay -- nor will she pay. Nor does Fairtax hustlers expect she will pay.

Fairtax needs to tax all "expenditures"  -- including cancer expenditures, city county and state expenditures, all kinds of goofy things that can not be taxed this way, to make their math work.



So, YES.  They (Fairtax hustlers) always knew this was a fraud -- a deliberate deception.  

Neal Boortz fraudulently made it SEEM as if Dale Jorgenson of Harvard, and others, proved all these amazing things. Utter nonsense, they did even deal with Fairtax -- that is, these huge other taxes, the taxes on the poor, the impossible taxes on city county and states hidden in the fine print.

Scientologist and Fairtax hustlers were pretty good  at taking a half truth here, a total lie there, and fooling people. Like claiming Fairtax is a retail sales tax.

Well, they have a retail sales tax, but that's only a tiny part of it.

In fact, Fairtax was started by Scientologist to raise money from suckers -- not to pass, but to raise money.  Some of them STILL  raise money from suckers on this goofy Fairtax fraud.


Build a library or courthouse for 20 million? Your city would owe almost 5 million IN ADVANCE as a tax.

Did they ever mention that?  Did Boortz? Huckabee?  Anyone?

Hell no.

Pay the police and firemen 20 million a year in wages, benefits and pensions -- your city owes almost 5 million in fed taxes.

Did they ever tell you that?

Well, that's  the kind of "expenditures" that are in their fraudulent tax base.   They told you in clever deceptive ways,  while the books, videos and speeches gave you pure bullshit about a very simple personal retail sales tax, all nicely researched.

Those lying bastards.  They have no research.  They have their own fraudulent documents, which are not research, that they call research.  And they lied every time their opened their mouths.

Like the massive impossible cancer patient tax -- even on the poorest of the poor.   

Do you think a cancer victim, making 20K a year total, is going to pay 32,000 dollar fed taxes, just on her chemo and surgery?

 We show you their OWN documents that you probably could not even find on your own, much less "decode" the bullshit. 




How do they tax  wages, pensions and  operational expenditures?

They TOLD you in a fraudulent, misleading way, but they did tell you.    In their "tax base" documents and definitions,  if you were clever enough to put it all together, and check the math.


What they tell you they tax in books, in videos, in speeches, is not what they actually tax.  They claim to be a "very very simple" personal retail sales tax.

So, no, they do not have a simple personal retail sales tax. They have massive goofy other taxes, far far larger than the sales tax they make suckers believe their plan is about.


By defining "consumption" like lying bastards in the fine print tricks, but telling you something else in books, speeches and videos,  they deliberately created a fraud, mostly to raise money from stupid people to support them -  not to pass a tax plan.


They do not have a tax plan. They have nonsense. 



See the fine print, the person "using or consuming" the goods or services is liable -- without exception.


And their math is based on this.  Not on purchases. 


Not just "natural persons" like human beings. But they actually have tricky definitions that they claim allows them to tax all city county and states, on things like wage, pension and capital investment expenditures.


All those "consumptions"  are in their tax base.  Tax base = what they tax. 






Because that cancer tax -- without exception -- is just one of many taxes Fairtax uses to make their fraudulent math work.


Yes, they tax all cancer victims --"without exception" -- not on their purchase -- remember that, purchases are not taxed,  CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURES are taxed.

Without exception.   Remember that -- without exception.


MATH DEPENDS ON IT.

Fairtax taxes all "personal and governmental consumption expenditures".   

Very clever.    So while Fairtax gives these examples like buying a shirt -- the lying bastards never say a word about the woman with breast cancer, or the Alzheimer patient in a nursing home, "consuming"  120,000 dollars of services, which she would be liable for a  30,000  fed tax.

Very clever too -- and it's in their fine print tricks, too -- the massive taxes on city county and state wages, pensions and capital investment expenditures.

EXPEND  800,000 dollars on a library, and your city would owe 200,000 dollars in fed taxes.

That's in their math.  We show you.

Yes, of course, you think they mean they tax purchases. Oh hell no. 

Fairtax OWN volunteer spokesmen, like David Kendall, had no clue -- none whatsoever -- that Fairtax had these massive taxes on every city county and state.




Kendal, a PhD in economics, could not find the fine print about taxes on wages, pensions, and capital investments, (in advance and otherwise)  until we told him.


Not a clue -- their own (volunteer) spokesmen, had no clue of these massive other taxes.   So how the hell were you supposed to know?

That's just it -- you were not supposed to know anything about these other taxes -- they just told you the horse shit about a "very simple personal retail sales tax.





Do Fairtax hustlers really expect the very poor will pay massive taxes?

No -- they are not stupid.  They are lying bastards, and they needed "all consumption"  taxed 23% to make their math work.


One problem.  If they only tax retail sales, the tax rate would be more like 89%





The basic thing President Bush Tax Panel reported about Fairtax fraud, is that if Fairtax ONLY taxed what you spent on retail items, the tax rate would be 89%




So I show  you what these lying bastards did -- and their fine print -- below, and I am not polite.  The Bush Tax Panel was polite, in public.  But in private,  William Gale, PhD, Stanford, was not polite, and said of Fairtax lying bastards, they lie a lot."    



SLOGANS SOUNDED  GREAT
THEY FOOLED ME






SLOGANS SOUNDED  GREAT  -- All that research.  22 million dollars of research!!  Wow.

Who would lie about that?   We can just check the research!

All prices drop. Everyone gets a check to pay their taxes!!  Fairtax is voluntary.   Research shows US business will increase profits drastically, and the US will once again be "the economic powerhouse of the world."


_______________________________

The only problem -- Neal Boortz lied to us with a straight face -- will be where to put all the money rolling into the US Treasury.

 THE FINE PRINT?

Their tricky  "tax base".  

Tax base, by definition, is what they actually tax. 
Oh -- really?   A very simple personal retail sales tax?  Oh fucking bullshit. Those lying pieces of sh it.

The retail sales tax is only ONE TINY PART.   They have massive impossible other taxes, in their fine print.    


Not just  hidden in the fine print -- IMPOSSIBLE other taxes, hidden in the fine print.

_______________________________



So where is the research?

There is no research -- none whatsoever -- about a "very very simple" personal retail sales tax.  Not 22 million dollars worth.  Not 22 dollars worth.

Not 22 cents worth.

And they know that. 


So when they yap about "research" -- 22 million dollars worth they say, they sure as hell are NOT talking about research on a simple retail sales tax.

See that -- look close.   It's their document.  Read it CLOSELY. 

















It's not research anyway -- lying and hiding your fraud in some documents, to fool folks, is not research.   They have documents by folks they paid -- but hustling and distorting, on purpose, is not research.

It's a fucking fraud. 



The most researched economic plan in history -- that's what Boortz said.

And the lying bastards list all kinds of crap which seems to be detailed support of their fine print.

Wrong -- we contacted dozens of their "researchers"   and time after time, we found folks who had no idea what was in the fine print.   Nor did they do any research whatsoever.

Only one person, Larry Kotlikoff,  that we contacted actually knew what was in Fairtax fine print -   and he worked for Fairtax, he was hired to do their public relations.



Kotlikoff  has no research, either, and our 50,000 dollar offer, is for showing 1 page of their 22 million dollars of research, into this very very simple personal retail sales tax, to replace all other fed taxes, in a revenue neutral fashion."   

See more details below.   We show you  his documents -- which include the massive impossible other taxes, like taxes on all city county and states on their wage, pension, and capital investments.

_______________________________


So, we did.  We checked what they call research,  and the names they mentioned.   At first we thought-- who the hell would claim 22 million in research, when there is none?

Well, that's exactly what happened. Fairtax fraud is not only has no research at all,  per a real definition of research we show here, but Fairtax is a goofy hustle,  not about a simple retail sales tax to replace anything.  

You have to read their words very very carefully. Like this clever graphic, shown above, and repeated here. 


The "research"  is layers of goofy defintions, assumptions (we show you) and impossible nonsense, and has nothing to do with Fairtax as told to you in speeches, books, videos, by guys like Huckabee, Boortz,  and others.

That's not research, but the opposite of it. Yet these lying bastards -- yes, they are lying bastards -- claim 22 million of research.  They have documents were are the OPPOSITE of research, and show the OPPOSITE of that they claim in slogans, and what they say in their books, videos and speeches.



Even if you are stupid enough to consider their bullshit nonsense (see below, it's really nonsense) as research, it's sure as hell not research about a very simple personal retail consumption tax, to replace all other fed taxes.

_________________________________

SOUNDS GREAT -- WE FELL FOR IT.

Fairtax slogans sound great -- slogans always sound great.   But what about the fine print?  And, where is that research?  

What do they really tax - in the fine print?

Gee -- Boortz "forgot" to tell you about the OTHER 2.1 Trillion dollars in taxes, in books, videos and speeches. Not once, not in 15 years. 

We show you Boortz, and others, deliberately left out,  or otherwise made sure you had no clue what Fairtax actually taxed, on paper.

______________________________________________







SLOGANS SOUNDS GREAT!!!  

Completely exempts the poor, they said.

Is voluntary -- they said -- because you will see the tax on your sales receipt.

Every citizen gets a check - in advance -- to pay the taxes on "necessities".

Very very simple -- a retail sales tax, you pay at "point of purchase" 

____________________________________


Oh bullshit.  Yes, they have a retail sales tax, for a small part of what they tax.

They dare not tell you, in any candid way, what they actually tax, on paper, to make the math "work".


It's like taxing moonbeams and babyfarts for 2.1 trillion dollars, and calling that a very simple personal retail sales tax.  No, they do not tax baby farts, but what they DO tax, on paper, is just as goofy, just as fraudulent, and we show you.

And -- we offer you, or anyone, 50,000 dollars if you can show 1 page of that 22 million dollars of research they claim proved all their wonderful slogans were true.

The biggest fraud these bastards have, is the slick mention of "NIPA defined taxes"  in their very clever fine print. In documents you never heard about, and probably could not find if you wanted to.

We show you. 


Should be easy, right?  If they have 22 million in research about this very simple personal retail sales tax, to replace all other fed taxes, including Social Security and Medicare -- they can show one fucking page, right?


Is that right, or not.


They have no page, and certainly not 22 million dollars worth of research.   See deteails of this very real offer, below. 

No research -- we show you what these lying bastards called research. 





They do have a retail sales tax -- for a small part. 

But they have massive and other impossible taxes, in the fine print, a few words here, a few there.

And that is how their math adds up.  

If they do not tax -- on paper -- all these other things,  they would have to admit an 89% sales tax rate.  Remember that, all that "research"  is total bullshit, by their own hired public relations hustlers,  see below. 

They have massive "NIPA DEFINED" taxes, they never mentioned, in books, videos or speeches.  Not once, not in 15 years.  That's the biggest part of Fairtax -- these "other taxes"  like taxes on all cities for wage and pension and operational expenditures.









This is their OWN public relations company, in their OWN official document.  

And they told you, if you found all their documents, and read them very very very closely.   Here is one -- tricky as hell, but the lying bastards wrote it down, tricky or not. 









The retail sales tax is NOT the problem.  The problem is, the 2 Trillion dollars of impossible other taxes -- yes impossible -- they included in fine print, in documents you likely never heard of.




We show you. 

Massive impossible other taxes, in the fine print.

Like massive taxes on all cancer victims, including 32,000 fed tax (no exceptions whatsoever) on anyone consuming 150K worth of cancer surgery and chemo.



We show  you -- in their clever and deceptive fine print, and math, where every cancer victim is taxed, without exception, $23,000 dollars, if they consume, 100K in goods and services.

Absolutely no exceptions -- their math, and fine print, is based on this. No exceptions whatsoever.  No matter if the cancer victim is wealthy, poor, has insurance, whatever the case, that person is liable for the tax, without exception.

Fairtax math is based on all cancer victims paying these huge taxes.  And that's how the whole scam "works" on paper.  Massive other taxes, cleverly inserted in the fine print.  We show you.



Why tax all cancer victims -- without exception -- these massive impossible taxes?

To make their math work.  As you will see, these cancer taxes are just the tip of the iceberg.

Most of Fairtax has nothing to do with retail sales taxes.

Most of Fairtax -- as we show from their own documents -- are taxes on anything but retail sales. Yes, they tax retail sales,  but that's only a tiny part of what they tax.   

And they did it all, by clever deception.  It's in their fine print, their footnotes, their math.  But unless you are smart enough to decode it -- or even, find it all -- you could have no clue. 








________________________________

PLEASE PASS FAIRTAX FRAUD

REALLY
__________________________________



_____________________________________________

WHY THEY NEED ALL THOSE OTHER TAXES...

Personal retail 23% tax would only bring in 1.4 trillion

Let me repeat that -- Personal retail 23% tax would only bring in 1.4 trillion


But Fairtax has their math rigged to LOOK like they will bring in 3.5 Trillion.     Where, oh where, do they get the "other 2.1 Trillion dollars?

By these goofy and impossible "NIPA" taxes.  They told you, if you read all their documents, and ignored the slogans.
 videos, about 2.1 Trillion in taxes, that are impossible?

No -- they did not forget. Quite the opposite, they went through a lot of trouble and money to fool you.   Yes, the lying bastards went through  a lot time, effort and money, to make their fraud seem like a genuine simple retail sales tax.

And every second of that time -15 years-- they knew they had massive impossible other taxes, in the fine print. 

_____________________________________________

WHY NOT EXEMPT MEDICAL CONSUMPTION?

They could not allow any exceptions because that tax rate would skyrocket.   Exempt health care -- the tax rate goes to 35 or 40%.

 Exempt city and states for wage and operational expenditures -- the tax rate goes up to 50 or 60%

(Yes they tax all city county and states on wage and operational expenditures).


Just tax personal retail sales -- that's the impression they give -- the tax rate would be 80-89%

  In other words, if they did not use fine print tricks, their tax rate would be more like 80-90%


 There is no research about a simple personal retail sales tax to replace all other fed taxes, because that's not what Fairtax is. 


Fairtax is a fraud.  They pretend to be a simple retail sales tax -- all researched -- to replace all other fed taxes.

Everyone gets a check from the government each month.

All prices go down.

And all problems are fixed-- Social security, medicare -  funded totally.   Deficit -- gone.  National debt -- gone.

"Illegals"  leave US because they don't get a check from US government every month.

All researched!

From their web site..... their own document....


 Everyone gets money  --- in advance -- to pay their taxes on "necessities"!    So there can not be any problems.

Especially with all that research, 22 million dollars of "independent research"  by "leading experts".




Prices drop 22% -- the research proves it!

Take home pay goes up average of 50% (Fairtax Book)  .. the research proves it!

They only problem will be (really) where to put the money!!  That's what Boortz said, the only problem is, where to put all the money!




FROM THEIR OWN DOCUMENT -- YOU NEVER SAW 



__________________________________________________

  This may not look like much -- the "NIPA" reference in a Fairtax official document.   But it's a BFD.    

With a few dozen other words -- we show you -- Fairtax very slick fine print, shows that HR25, and the entire "Fairtax"  hustle, has 2 trillion dollars of other taxes, that you must pay, on top of, in addition to, the retail sales tax.

Yes, they have a retail sales tax, that is not the problem.  The problem are the impossible, absurd, and fraudulently hidden (deliberately hidden) other taxes.





THIS IS A FAIRTAX DOCUMENT BELOW.   SEE THE NIPA REFERENCE ON EVERY LINE?

You would not ever see this if it were not for us, it's not available, except online, in their fraudulently labelled "research".    These lying bastards actually call the fraudulent double speak, "research'.


FROM THEIR OWN DOCUMENT -- YOU NEVER SAW 


ITS THE TAX BASE, STUPID.

___________________________________











Oh you don't think all city county and states have to pay taxes on wage expenditures, pension expenditures, operational expenditures?  Capital expenditures?

SEWER TAX --23million

For example, Dallas updates its sewer and water system for 100 million  dollars, in a large capital project.   Did you have a clue -- any clue -- Dallas city council would owe almost 24 million dollars, in advance, as a tax?

Yes -- and they DO tell you, sorta. Kinda.   In a fraudulent way, in the fine print we show you.

They do have a few words here, and then, in another document entirely, another few words.   Words like "all expenditures"   are in the "tax base".

And words like "capital investment"  is taxed in advance.

Only, they refuse to even be that blunt. They say, in a clever footnote we show you,  "WE ASSUME"   city and states will pay, and "WE ADOPT"  a PREPAY APPROACH.


We ADOPT A PREPAY APPROACH.

 You can hardly find these documents anyway, and even if you found them, you can easily read- skim -- right past these amazing words. 

Few people have any idea Fairtax even has these massive taxes on city county and states.   And even then, they suppose the tax in on retail purchases. Hell no -- read the words closely.  Capital expenditures, wages, pensions, operational expenditures are all "in the tax base"  by a few dozen carefully chosen, fraudulently placed, word. 

Since the lying bastards first made you think they are a simple retail sales tax,  a personal retail sales tax, you can easily not grasp what these bastards as doing with the double talk.

And the double talk is necessary -- for their math to work, on paper.



__________________________________


I PUT MY MONEY
WHERE MY MOUTH IS.

I offered- - and still do offer -- 50,000 dollars if any Fairtax supporter can show 1 page of that 22 million dollars of research, which they claim they did to prove this "very simple" personal retail sales tax, would replace all other fed taxes.

See full details below.

Boortz -- Neal Boortz, the guy who was paid to push Fairtax and wrote the fraudulent Fairtax Book -- has run from this offer for 6 years now.

Just show 1 page of that 22 million in research he always talked about -- repeatedly, almost endlessly.  One page, how hard is it?

When you understand they don't have any research, and they know they do not, you will know they are lying bastards.

Oh, they have documents, yes, from their own hired hustlers.  In t his case, Beacon Hill, a public relations company.

But that is in no way research, and certainly not research about a very simple personal retail sales tax.  In their own documents -- we show you the documents -- are the very clever, and very impossible, and very goofy, and very fraudulent (deliberately misleading) other taxes, which are huge, and impossible. 

And they have nothing to do with personal retail sales, or even sales, or even retail.
___________________________________________

This is how you know these bastards are frauds - not mistaken.  They claim as "research" some bullshit documents that not only are deceptive as hell, but certainly are not research at all. 
____________________________________________

We show you their own documents.  And remember, this is what THEY call research, and hope suckers believe is research about a very simple personal retail sales tax to replace all other fed taxes.

________________________________________________

THEY DID IT - IN THE "TAX BASE" DOCUMENTS.

Starting with the one, below.  Read it.

____________________________________


There is literally no way, it is impossible, to know what Fairtax taxes, or even come close to knowing what they tax, from their books, videos and speeches.

Even in the official fine print, they made it impossible to know what they tax, unless you put all their footnotes, double speak, and fraudulent double speak together, and figured out the math.

But it's there -- sorta kinda. 
  
________________________________________

But 


So what is in the tax base?

Drug dealers?

Hookers?  

Illegals?

Surprisingly, in math terms, the drug dealers etc are a tiny tiny fraction of what Fairtax taxes, so tiny, it almost does not matter.

All government expenditures -- all military expenditures, all wage and pension expenditures, all capital expenditures by all city county and states, all wages paid out by city county and states (except for education wages)  are "in the tax base".

So when California updated a bridge in San Francisco for 6 billion dollars, that would be "in the tax base".

California would owe 23% of that 6 billion as a tax.

Try to grasp how vile and deceitful these bastards are, to call this research, and to call it research about a "very very simple"  personal retail sales tax.

How the FUCK are all government capital expenditures, including military expenditures, including operational expenditures, a simple retail sale?

Scientologist came up with this fraud.  Not to pass it -- no one ever intended this fraud to get through Congress.  It was made for one purpose, to hustle stupid people from their money.

And that is what former Scientologist are STILL doing, still raising money from suckers, on this fraud.

  Other liars adopted it, for their own purposes.  Scientologist wanted to raise money from stupid people -- and they still do. 

But also other hustlers -- Huckabee, Boortz,  CATO institute, and Grover Norquest, FOX NEWS, assorted politicians, have pushed this fraud.  It sounds great, why not  push it?

What matters are the massive OTHER taxes, on top of, paid separately from, and in addition to, their deceptive personal sales tax.

Like they tax the federal government, and all city county and state governments, a 23% tax on all wage and pension expenditures.

The State of California would owe over 18-20 BILLION, yes billion, not in retail sales taxes, but wage and pension expenditure taxes, in operational expenditure taxes, in capital investment expenditure taxes.

  



Where is the research on all those taxes on city county and states?  They have none!   They cleverly "assume" it in the fine print.

____________________________________

If you think assuming impossible bullshit, and hiding it in the fine print, then calling that shit "research" about a very simple personal retail sales tax, get the hell of this page.

Im serious, get the hell off this page.

You are stupid, and are a perfect Fairtax sucker. 
__________________________________

WE NEED A NEW TAX CODE.  BUT TAXES ARE THE PLAY GROUND OF LYING BASTARDS.

FAIRTAX IS ONE EXAMPLE.  

There are others. 
___________________________________

Simple. Transparent.  All researched.




Neal Boortz tried to Hustle President Bush on Fairtax. Boortz is far left. 

Boortz was paid.

President Bush ordered Fairtax fine print examined by his Tax Panel.     They found the fraud - and reported it, in academic and polite terms. 

It was not that hard to see the fraud, if you can find the fine print and read it closely.  So President Bush Tax Panel found it rather easily,  by reading every footnote, paying attention to every "assumption"  and going over the math.

In public, the Bush Tax Panel was polite, but in private, William Gale, PhD,  Stanford, said this, "They lie a lot".

Indeed.  

 We are not so polite, but we show you the same things President Bush Tax panel did -- in blunt, even crude, but honest terms. 

____________________________

____________________________

VOLUNTARY?   Voluntary, they claim, because you can choose not to buy that shirt, or buy that new car. Just buy used!

Sounds sweet, like all their slogans.

Buy used?

Ever hear of used chemotherapy?

How about used pensions and operational expenditures?

How about used wages?

Fairtax is only marginally a retail sales tax, the biggest part of Fairtax are these taxes on things like all city county and state wage, pension, and operational expenditures.    

Every hear of used electricity?   Used dental ex rays?

How about used health insurance?  Yes, Fairtax has, in their tax base, all health insurance premiums.

 They try to tell suckers it's a very simple personal retail sales tax. Bullshit.

______________________________________

HOW IT'S IN THE TAX BASE.

Fairtax put these "expenditures"  in their "base"  with clever care.  You can see the totals in their tax base, and in one document, they kinda sorta, reveal it, but reveal it in a way no one could possibly grasp, on first, second, or third look, that they actually put in the tax base, all military spending, all health care expenditures, even NASA and military pensions.

How?  They tell you, they put ALL expenditures.   Then they cleverly "remove" education expenditures.   They did not make it clear in a line item, that they tax NYC or Dallas, or any city, 23% tax on their wage and pension expenditures.  

But all government expenditures -- without exception they tell you - are in the tax base.  


As President Bush Tax Panel showed -- this absurdity is deliberate, and goofy.  The tax panel, headed by William Gale, spotted the absurdities, but they eat fine print tricks for breaksfast, and spit them out for lunch 

___________________________________________________________________

AUDACITY 

But they told you, if you read very very VERY carefully, and ignored their distortions.


State and local governments must pay huge taxes -- they Fairtax says coyly, they "assume" city county and states will raise tax rates.



______________________________________


Most people could read their fine print -- if they could find it -- and still not grasp what these hustlers were doing.

If you already assume -- because they told you -- that Fairtax is a very simple personal retail sales tax of some kind, it would take a very sharp, very critical eye to spot the bullshit.

Who on earth would pretend (assume) to tax the federal government on it's military spending? On it's wage and pension expenditures?

Who on earth would pretend (assume as they cleverly say) that ever city, every county, every state, and even the federal goverment, would become a "major taxpayer".

Yes, MAJOR TAXPAYER.

Yet, they told you!

WE ASSUME YOUR CITY COUNTY AND STATES ARE SUPPOSE TO RAISE THERI TAX RATES

AND WE ASSUME ALL CITY COUNTY AND STATES WILL PAY IN ADVANCE.

ADVANCE.

Did we mention, ADVANCE?

Massive tax increases at city level.  Massive tax increases at county level.  Massive tax increases at state level.

That is an "assumption" in their own fine print tricks.

_____________________________________


IN ADVANCE 

  And many of these taxes, your city county and state have to pay IN ADVANCE. ITS IN THE FINE PRINT. 









WHY HAVE ALL THESE GOOFY TAXES?


Why have all these goofy other taxes?
To make the math work.   These other taxes are actually the biggest part of Fairtax -- the personal  retail sales tax is a small part of Fairtax. 

Without these massive other (and impossible) taxes in the "tax base"  -- Fairtax math would show an 89% tax rate, not 23.


Fairtax cleverly  included these massive other taxes not because they are stupid, but because they had to make their math add up on paper. These lying pieces of shit, needed to make their math add up, in fraudulent ways, so they did. 

They could not sell an 89% retail sales tax.   And if you look very closely, of course, they do not have a retail sales tax.  They have layers of goofy taxes, that you have to pay, on top of, in addition to, the retail sales tax.

They don't care, though, because they are not trying to pass their own fraud. Rather unique that way.   The goal of the "inside" hustlers is just to raise money from stupid people.   And they have done that for years, on this hustle. 












California, for example, would owe over 20 billion.

Remember, this is very cleverly inserted, yet their math is based on these absurdities.

No one told California, or any state about it. Fairtax did not tell any city about it, any county.





Drug dealers will pay.  Prostitutes will pay.   You will get rebate check every month to pay taxes on "necessities".

Prices will go down -- pay will go up.   The only problem, Boortz said with a straight face, will be where to put all the money.

Huckabee said he will just "wave the magic wand"  of Fairtax to solve fix the economy and illegal immigration.

And all researched.  22 million dollars of research. (Actually, they don't have one page of research, see below)

Only IRS agents and lobbyist would be against Fairtax economic plan.  Not just a "tax code"  but an economic plan, researched by world experts -- 22 million dollars of research,

(See whey they  can't show one page of actual research)

 Fairtax -- which according to Bruce Bartlett, started out as a Scientology fund raising hustle -- is not even a tax code. 

But it sounds wonderful, and had me fooled, too.  All that research!

_______________________________________________

WHO WOULD CLAIM 22 MILLION DOLLARS OF INDEPENDENT RESEARCH -- WHEN THERE IS NONE?


HUSTLERS  --- THAT'S WHO

Fairtax is not a tax code.  It is a fund raising scam, started by scientologist to raise money.  

_______________________________________________

Will illegals, drug addicts, and criminals start paying taxes, finally?

Uh - no.  But your city, if you live in Dallas, will have to pay 150 million dollars in wage - pension -- and capital investment "expenditure" taxes.   Did you know that?

Oh you never heard of Fairtax massive taxes on all expenditures (including wage and pension expenditures) on every city?  Really? Well read the fine print very very - - very -- closely. And the math, read it closely.  It's not only there, these "other taxes" are by far the biggest part of Fairtax. 

Oh, and your cousin, or mother, or wife, with breast cancer, could owe 20-40 even 50 thousand dollars in fed taxes, 





Pass the fraud -- I want to see them tax cancer victims 20, 30, even 40 thousand dollars because they "consumed"  surgery and chemo.






Pass the fraud -- I want to see them tax Dallas Texas City council 150-200 million dollars for their "wage, pension, operational and capital investment expenditures"  in advance or not.

These other taxes, that they hide a few words here, a few words there, are impossible bullshit. Not kinda, not sorta, but impossible bullshit.  They could not possibly collect 60% of their revenue, and those who wrote this fine print,  know that.

We show you why.

Impossible. Bullshit.



______________________

The truth is, there is no easy answer to taxes, certainly not one that people would be thrilled about.   We need a 10 page tax code that is clear, honest, and simple to understand.  But so many people would insist on exceptions, changes, advantages, our country would never pass it.   


_______________________________________________

Yes, Fairtax sounds GREAT. All frauds sound great. 

A "very very simple" personal retail sales tax. 



_______________________________________________

Fairtax fraud was exposed before -- politely -- by President Bush Tax Panel, in 2005.

We show you the same things President Bush Tax Panel found (all in the fine print) but we are not polite. 

Remember, all this was exposed already.  And Fairtax hustlers know that. 












Fairtax suckers better read the fine print, CLOSELY....  this is their own document.  If you can find it, it's online in their "research"  BS. 






Is it their fault you didn't read all their fine print? (yes).

Is it their fault you fell for their slogans? (Yes)

In the slogans, the books, the videos, they tell you one story.

But in the fine print, it's an absurdly different thing -- massive impossible and goofy taxes that can not possibly be collected, but are there anyway, to make the math work 

Still, pass it. It would be hilarious, and a great lesson for us all.

________________________________________________________________

THEY CALL THAT RESEARCH.

Massive hidden and impossible taxes, in the fine print. Their hidden and deceptive fine print is in what they call "research"  and it's refered to in HR25.

There never was any research, or researchers.  Never an office, a computer, a phone, a paper clip, involved in the "research".  It was always a scam.   Scientologist started it, to fund raise from stupid people.  Huck and others liked the scam so well, they used it for their own purposes.


_______________________________________________

Whats wrong with taxing everything NIPA defines as government or personal consumption "expenditures"?









A lot. For one thing, most of that can not possibly be taxed.  That tax could not possibly be collected -- like taxing a Medicare patient 40,000 dollars for their cancer care.

All cancer care is "in the tax base".  There are no exceptions -- nor can they have any, or the tax rate has to go way, way up.

ITS LIKE 

TAXING MOONBEAMS

TAXING BABY FARTS

_______________________________________________


DO YOU KNOW WHAT  NIPA IS? 


No, not an auto parts store.


 NIPA (National Income and Products Accounts) is a term Fairtax hustlers use in their own documents (they hilariously call research) to fool you.





_______________________________________________

Fairtax hustlers, to make their fraudulent math work,  tax everything in NIPA accounts, and much much more. 


How do they "tax" it?  By putting it in the "tax base".



This is from their own document. Notice, NIPA is on every line.





Remember this -- what they "put in the tax base"  is by definition, what they tax. 





They do tell you -- a few words here, and a few words there. All consumption (wait till you learn what that means!) is taxed without exception.

Even wage, pension, and capital investment "consumption"  by all city county and states, are taxed.  It's in their fine print.   Their math is based on it -- as if every city in the US will send in a 23% tax on all their operational expenditures, all their wage expenditures, all their pension expenditures, etc.

And as if every cancer victim can and will send in 23% tax on their consumption of surgery and chemo services.








So you must understand their tax base, to understand their fraud.


They do tax retail sales, but also, they tax all wages, pensions, capital investments, operational expenditures, of every city, every county and every state, because those things (and much more, are "in the tax base"). 


 Only 1.4 Trillion is a tax on normal retail sales -- that's not the problem. 









SO in this ONE document, online, and not in any book, any video, or any speech about Fairtax, these lying bastards  have an ADVANCE tax on all capital expenditures, paid out, by all cities, all states, all counties.

Fairtax has that in the fine print. It's in the "tax base" fine print.

It's how their math adds up.




Yes, retail sales are in the "tax base".  But that's only a tiny part of their tax base, and never ever do they explain that.

Worse, if possible, is the fact these other taxes are impossible. They can not force, for example, New York City to send in 800 million dollars because of a footnote, or clever tax table.

But they have footnotes (we show you) and tax tables (we show you) that have these massive other taxes in them. 

In fact, Fairtax hustle is all about hiding the fact that they  have massive impossible other taxes, in the "tax base". 



 If they could actually collect these massive other taxes, on cities, on counties, on states, even on the federal government,  they would not even need to tax "natural persons"  (humans) at all. That is how goofy these other taxes are.


They could just tax all city county states, and the federal government, like a never ending perpetual motion machine, if that were possible, but it's  not possible. And they know it, which is why they had to hide the fraudulent impossible other taxes in a few word here, a few words there.


  Yes, as you will see, these lying bastards tax the federal government too, then count that money as spendable money the federal government can use.


_______________________________________

BOORTZ EXAMPLE TRICKS


Boortz never gave an example of a city paying 50 million dollars in taxes on their operational expenditures.

Boortz never gave an example of a city paying 50 or 100 million tax to the federal government, for their pension and capital investment expenditures. 


 All examples Boortz ever gave,  as far as we know, were for retail things like buying lunch, or a jacket. Even then he made it seem like no matter what the tax is, it's essentially free, because the tax will not actually cost anything, or very little, because all prices fall.

That's bullshit of course, but falling prices by very nearly the amount of the tax, is Boortz's favorite lie. 


It's absurd -- but their hustle sounded good, because they paid Beacon Hill and others to dress it up, and push it.  You have to read their fine print very closely to see how absurd it is. 







Fairtax is a goofy fraud, because in their own documents, are layers of absurdities.  Rather like saying "We will tax moonbeams and baby farts to get 2 trillion.

Of course they don't say they will tax moonbeams and baby farts -- too obvious.  But what they do tax, in the fine print, is exactly as possible, exactly as likely, exactly as rational, as taxing moonbeams and baby farts.


_______________________________________________




Still -- Pass the Fairtax fraud!   I would love it, because we could laugh at ourselves, and the fools who did not read the fine print, and learn, as a nation, how lying bastards work. 

People believe what sounds good -- especially politicians and hustlers, who got rich, and attention, for selling the hustler.  It does sound good/ 

They all sounded great -- with all kinds of supposed research.  Yet it turns out, Fairtax is a Scientology based fraud, apparently made up for some Scientologist to raise money from suckers.    But the slogans sounded SO good, that hustlers like Woodall, Boortz, and Huckabee got a ride on that fraudulent train.

So let's pass it.   Maybe then we can get a tax code that is not a fraud, once we learn how easily we were fooled by this one.  Anything -- even passing Fairtax fraud -- would be worth it.


Fairtax fooled me -- and a lot of others -- by their incessant claims of 22 million dollars of research into this "very very simple"  personal retail sales tax, to replace all other fed taxes, including social security taxes, income taxes, etc. 

"The most researched economic plan in history," claimed Neal Boortz, author of "The Fairtax Book".   

I believed that -- who would lie about that?

Fifty percent average increase in take home pay, Boortz wrote.  Every possible good thing - more jobs, more economic growth



_______________________________________________


Fairtax former sucker reveals the Fairtax Hustle.

Caution --  blunt language. 

But I back it up, with their own fine print. For years now, I offered 50,000 dollars if anyone can show 1 page of that 22 million dollars of research they claim, proves their claim about this "very very simple" personal retail sales tax, to replace all other fed tax.

See more about the 50K offer -- a real offer, check with your attorney -- below.  The details are very important, in this offer, and in Fairtax hustle. 


_______________________________________________



IF YOU DON'T KNOW THEIR TAX BASE

YOU DON'T KNOW SHIT.  

______________________________________________________


TAX BASE = WHAT THEY TAX 


DO you know what they tax?

Hell no you don't -- you can not possibly know what they tax, from their books, their videos and their speeches.

Do you even know what  NIPA is?  

In their public hustle, they avoid any mention of the massive OTHER taxes -- the impossible and goofy taxes that are not only unconstitutional as hell, but goofy as goofy gets.

They pretend -- in their math --- that they will collect over 1 trillion dollars from city county and states, which their own fine print cleverly admits would (drastically) raise all city county and state taxes.

That's right, massive tax increases on city county state -- and federal -- level. That is just ONE of the assumptions, and it's clever as hell.  




And we show you that fine print.





All in very clever language, placed a few words here, a few words there, in online documents, never in their books. Never in their speeches. Never in their videos.  

We adopt a prepay approach to "government investments" -- like operational expenditures, pensions, wages,  all kinds of things.

In advance -- yes in advance.   But in advance or not, this is the point, these other taxes are impossible bullshit, and make up most of Fairtax.

Only a small part of Fairtax has anything to do with normal retail personal sales taxes. 

________________________________________


The "simple retail sales tax" will fix everything.

Illegals taking US jobs -- gone.

Huge increase in take home pay (50% said Boortz) -- done.

Solves Social Security and Medicare -- done.

US businesses become "powerhouse of the world -done.

All researched - 22 million dollars of research.

(If they have 1 page of that 22 million dollars of research, they have not shown it.  We offer 50K for one page -- see details below) 
_______________________________________________




_______________________________________________


Fairtax has massive goofy impossible -- yes impossible -- taxes in the fine print.

Fairtax hustlers have no intention to pass their own plan.  


The Fairtax is political theater, not a tax plan.
_______________________________________________

In the fine print (yes, you should have looked) are massive impossible taxes.  They do tax retail sales, but they simply had to insert massive impossible taxes, too, to make the math work.

 Why have impossible taxes in a few words, here and there?

Again, to make the math work.



This is from their own document.

PS. they call this "research". 

What do they tax "without exception".











__________________________________________

WHY FAIRTAX IS NOT TEN PAGES LONG

Fairtax is over 1 million words -- counting their "supporting research"  where they put most of their fraud. 

  HR-25, the legislation, is also a fraud, but you need to know their definitions, footnotes, assumptions, and other slick shit the hustlers had to put somewhere, so they put them in their "research".

Every Fairtax sucker we know, insists they read HR25, but no, they did  not,  If they read it closely, they would know basic things, and its clear they have no clue.  Like the definition of a person.  Very funny definition actually,  they were probably laughing when they wrote it.

And their "calculator" trick.  Another joke, and it took them a long time to come up with that one.   

We show you.


______________________________________________

_______________________________________________

A PERSON WHO MAKES 55K could easily own, in Fair Taxes, over 100% of his income, in taxes. 

Really.  He could owe double or triple his income, it does not matter.

So when Fairtax lying bastards tell you your fed taxes would be far less than your income taxes, they are lying out their ass.  Your income taxes -- as vile as they are -- are not 150% or 500% of your income.  But Fairtax could be, depending on what you consumed, such as borrow for, or got insurance to pay for, or whatever.






Have you ever seen Fairtax put a side by side comparison of what you would pay for fed taxes, and the consumption listed?

Hell no.

Yes, millions of people would owe massive, impossible taxes.  That does not even include the massive (impossibly massive) taxes on city county and states.

And they never showed you anything like this, did they.  Think that was by accident?  That they never showed you -- ever -- what a person would pay as taxes, on all consumption?


Hell no it's no accident. They would have to show the goofy shit, of paying massive taxes, more than you even made in many cases, if you had cancer issues.

And they would have to show you the city county and state taxes, the increase on all those.




_______________________________________________



CLICK TO SEE THEIR FRAUDULENT CALCULATOR


Fairtax calculator fraud -- spent thousands on this fraudulent calcultor...




SCIENTOLOGIST FAIRTAX CALCULATOR

See their "calculator" trick.  These lying bastards actually created a "Fairtax calculator"   that actively prevents you from knowing, or even getting a clue, of what your fairtax would be.

But wow, did it look great!!!

FAIRTAX CALCULATOR FRAUD





_______________________________________________


TAX PANEL HAD NO TROUBLE

When Boortz tried to sell President Bush his Fairtax hustle, the President  did the smart thing - he had it studied, by his tax panel.

Headed by William Gale, PhD from Sanford, and his tax panel, did not have to work that hard.  They just had to find the fine print ---and read it very carefully.   

To those stupid people who think the slogans matter, or Fairtax Books matter, here is a clue.  READ THE FINE PRINT.


Beacon Hill is hired.

One problem for most folks, even if they wanted to read HR25 itself, word for word, the fine print is not in one place -- too obvious.

  You first have to gather all the fine print, which means all the documents by Beacon Hill, Fairtax's paid public relations firm.


Beacon Hill "further explains"  their legislation, and presents itself as the "research".   They actually call their fraudulent (deliberately deceptive) documents "research". No, it's not research, it's the opposite of research.


Also, in no way is Beacon Hill an "educational organization"  --  they hire out, as they did for Fairtax, to back liars and hustlers.  They got paid to do it.


But did Beacon Hill lie, itself ?  We think so, but they were very careful, lots of "assumptions"  and definition tricks, so maybe they told the truth, if you think deception over all, then saying "we assume"  some absurdity, makes it all honest.

Not honest, whatsoever.  And look closely, Beacon Hill never said this was rational, or possible, did they?    They rather made some goofy preposterous assumptions, stated and implied, and then sold that absurdity.,

Was it their fault you believed them?

The Beacon Hill documents are clever as hell, look at them closely. There is where most of the almost comical sophistry takes place -- their "assumptions"  like "we assume city and states will take necessary measure"  to pay for Fairtax -- raise their tax rates.

So did they lie?  

If you say "We assume moon beams and baby farts will pay 2.1 Trillion"   then have a tax plan that gets 2.1 trillion from that nonsense, is that a lie?  I think it's a lie, because it's deliberate deception, and Beacon Hill was out to deceive, not inform.  

No, they did NOT say they assume to tax baby farts.  But what they cleverly insert into the fine print, into the "tax base"  is as goofy as if they had used "baby fart" tax.    

Of course, President Bush Tax Panel were not fooled by the billshit for ten minutes.   You first have to read all the fine print tricks, and have a good grasp of the art of lying your ass off in a way that sounds smart.   Tea Party suckers, and those who pander to them, almost never have a clue.  SO they were easily fooled. 

The Bush tax panel had folks that eat fine print tricks for breakfast, and spit  them out for lunch.  The Tea Party has fools who love their cult daddy, and therefore assume the slogans Fairtax hustlers use, must be the truth, or at least, close to it. 

______________________________________




They have none. It's all a fraud.  

A political bit of nonsense, started, it seems, by Scientologist hustlers to raise money, but taken over by Tea Party hustlers, also to make money from suckers.

_______________________________________________



SLOGANS 

FOOL STUPID PEOPLE

REPEATEDLY

1) Slogans fool stupid people repeatedly.  

(Fooled me too).

2) Slogans always sound great.

3) Slogans never match the fine print



_______________________________________________


At least Fairtax had fine print -- hard to find, deceptive, and fraudulent, but it's there, we show you.  Flat tax bastards ONLY have slogans. They dare not write down the fine print, so there is none.


FLAT TAX IS A FRAUD TOO

SLOGAN BASED FRAUD

FLAT TAX HAS NO FINE PRINT





Flat tax is as flat as Dog the Bounty Hunter's  wife.

Flat as Pikes Peak.

Flat as the Alps.  

But stupid people are always fooled by slogans, and these hustlers actually construct their fraud around the fact, people are stupid, and almost never look past the slogans. 


As Mitt Romney said in one of the 2012 Presidential debates, the flat tax would have him paying virtually no taxes at all. He paid rather little anyway, but Flat tax would put him at very near to no fed taxation, at all.

But the name is flat. That's what they do, time after time. Clever and misleading names, but suckers eat it up.


_______________________________________________











Flat tax won't even release any fine print -- only slogans.  Fairtax does have fine print, but you have to read all 68 documents, and read them very very carefully.

Flat tax would not even do that much, because flat tax is the opposite of flat.


 If you are a Fairtax sucker, it's not really your fault, except you were too stupid to read the fine print very closely.   


You only know what you are told.  Me, too.  So if I had not read the fine print, I would still be dumb as a rock about Fairtax.





HR 25 -- the legislation. Without exception. Sounds like normal legalese, right?

Uh, not so much.  Those two words are very important, without exception, because that is how their math adds up.  All things in their tax base, are taxed without exception.




All wage, pension and capital investments "expended" by all city county and states, and even capital expenditures, spending, wages, and pensions expended by the federal government, are in the tax base.


FROM THEIR OWN DOCUMENT

Read it again, how they define their tax base.   They don't tell you this in books, videos or speeches.

They have never even mentioned "NIPA"  or explained this in any book, video or speech.  But NIPA is a BFD in Fairtax.

Nothing else comes close. 

If you read their online documents, very closely, you would have seen it.  Maybe. 


But they told you.  They told you in their document about their TAX  BASE.

WHAT THE HELL DO THEY TAX?

You may think you know what they tax.  No, you fucking don't have a clue,  if you think it's anything like their books, videos, or speeches.

________________________________


NIPA???

WHAT THE HELL IS NIPA?


NIPA actually has nothing  to do with taxes.  It's a table in Bureau of Economic Activity. 

Anything in NIPA, according to their own fine print, is in the tax base.

They tax base is what they tax.


They told you, right?  In that one page. A page you would never likely see.  In a paragraph, very cleverly written, to obfuscate -- lie about -- what they tax. 
__________________________________

Fairtax hustlers "FORGET"  to mention the massive -- impossibly massive, absurdly unconstitutional -- taxes they impose on every city, every county, and every state.


Chart is from sworn testimony to Ways Means Committee
by a former Fairtax supporter.





MASSIVE TAXES ON ALL CITY COUNTY AND STATES

A BFD



FROM THEIR OWN FINE PRINT..




Mesquite Arizona would owe over 200,000 dollars in fed taxes, just on their "expenditure" for a partial group of new fireman, for their pay and benefits.

Fairtax math is based on it.

They never told you

They have it, deceptively, in the fine print, re NIPA


But - did you know Social Security receipts pay the Social Security benefits?  And Social Security receipts actually bring in MORE than it pays out.  Much of government total revenue, comes from Social Security and Medicare taxes.  Few people seem to grasp that, but it's true. 



WOW-- no more Social Security taxes!!!

You will collect Social Security, and Medicare Medicaid if you need it, as if you always paid into it. But you will no longer have to pay!

You could possibly pay almost no federal taxes -- and no social security taxes at all. To pay almost no taxes, just buy a used car, used home, barter for your food or grow it yourself. 

And get a prebate check every month anyway.

And get Social Security and Medicare benefits anyway.

Wow, what deal!!
____________________________________


YES THE SLOGANS SOUND GREAT.

TO BAD THE SLOGANS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE FINE PRINT.

____________________________________



Of course the slogans sound great.  No "tax plan" ever sounded better!.

We were fooled by that 22 MILLION IN RESEARCH.

Who would lie about that?   We could just read the research!  

So, we did. And others read the fine print, too.
_________________________________

 We show you what they call "research" - hint, hiding goofy impossible frauds in your own papers, is not research.




_________________________________

CANCER VICTIM TAX 

This was all exposed, politely, over a decade ago, by President Bush Tax Panel.   They showed, in academic terms, just how goofy Fairtax was, because of massive impossible "other taxes."


__________________________________


Why not tell us that in books, videos or speeches? 

 They do have massive taxes -- every cancer victim is liable, and there are not exceptions.


Like every city is liable for a 23% tax on wage expenditures.  And pension expenditures. And capital investment expenditures -- in advance.

That's right -- all capital investment expenditures, like a new sewer system, a new library -- is taxed, IN ADVANCE.

We show you that fine print.

__________________________________


 The math, as you will see, is based literally on collecting 100% of these other taxes, no matter how impossible,  how hidden, how unfair.

FROM THEIR OWN DOCUMENTS...




FROM THEIR OWN DOCUMENTS ....



FROM THEIR OWN DOCUMENTS.....



__________________________________



They do NOT tell you what they tax, in books, not in videos, not in speeches.

What does Fairtax tax?   Do you know?

Retail sales? Yes, for a tiny part. But you have to pay massive other taxes -- far larger taxes -- on top of, in addition to, the retail sales tax.

Did you know that?

No.  You can not possibly know what Fairtax taxes, from their books, videos and speeches.  They never tell you.

__________________________________


Oh, you can find it!

Oh, you can learn what they tax, the way President Bush Tax Panel had to learn -- by finding all their documents,  and reading them all, line by line, footnote by footnote, assumption by assumption.

None of which are in the material they present to the public in their slick presentations.

Yet they claim their plan is "TRANSPARENT".   Really?  No one can possibly know what they tax, from the books, videos and speeches. It's not difficult to know from that information, it is literally impossible to know.
THEY DO NOT TAX WAGES!!??


Oh really?





They tell us it's a VERY VERY simple personal retail sales tax, to be paid an "point of purchase".   As Boortz said 100 times, you will see your fed tax on your cash register receipt.

All the example, he gave, and anyone gave, were about that cash register sale.  You buy a coat, pay for lunch, buy a toaster.

Not one example about New York City, and how the city council would owe over 800 million dollars in wage and pension and capital investment expenditures.
__________________________________


IN ADVANCE TAXES - on government "investments".   In a footnote. 


__________________________________



Embedded image permalink


 No exceptions whatsoever.

And their math is based on this.  Their math does NOT show Medicare or Medicaid paying the taxes imposed -- it shows, and says, the person pays it.


____________________________________

RETAIL TAX?

Retail?  Yes, they do tax retail purchases. For a small part of Fairtax.  


That retail sales tax is not the problem, at all.  The massive other taxes -- impossible hidden other taxes -- are the problem.

____________________________________


____________________________________


You find NIPA only very cleverly in their "fine print tricks."  Not in books, videos or speeches. This  below, however is one bit of wacko bullshit from their "research" documents.

Just one time, in one of their documents  you never saw.  But they did tell you, sorta. Kinda. In a fraudulent way.



Not just Texas, every state. 

Not just states - but every county, in every state.  Massive taxes on their wage, pension, and operational expenditures.

THEY TOLD YOU, sorta kinda. 

THIS IS FROM THEIR OWN DOCUMENT 





That's in their math -- that's in their fine print -- that's now their math adds up.

Did these lying bastards ever tell you that in a candid way?  Massive other taxes, on top of, in addition to, that sales tax?

They did tell you -- yes they did -- if you read every word very carefully, and some ignored their lies.    They told you in the way frauds tell sucers things, in a slick fraudulent way.




 _____________________________________


 DEFINITION OF  RESEARCH -- 

FAIRTAX  HUSTLERS HAVE LITERALLY NONE.




Funny how well intentioned suckers write about Fairtax, and have no clue -- absolutely no clue -- what is in Fairtax "tax base".


Nor can they show you any research.

They know Fairtax has some kind of "retail sales" tax, and add the pompous sounding "at point of purchase"  crap.

Most of Fairtax has no "point of purchase" -- because most of Fairtax is about consumption of things, not purchase.  They pretend cities "consume" wage and pensions!  Yes they do.

They treat all city county and state "expenditures,"  including payroll expenditures, pension expenditures, capital investment expenditures, as "retail sales". 

Embedded image permalink

Tax base = what they tax.  By definition, what is in their tax base, is what they tax.

So unless you know their tax base, YDKS.

_____________________________________





According to Bruce Bartlett, former Reagan advisor, he was approached by Scientologist to push Fairtax.   See more below.





No, Huckabee is not "in on the Scientology" fraud.

Huckabee and a few others just adopted the fraud, because it sounds so good.   It worked. He got results.   Not evil, but very clever politically.  




Boortz's book, Fairtax book, is page after page of amazing things.    The problem will be what to do with all the money.

Illegal immigration -- fixed.   Economy, fixed.   All wage earners, 50% average increase in pay. And this is all researched, they told us, including by Harvard researcher Dale Jorgenson.

Really?  Turns out, not so much. 


Social security and Medicare, solved.  On and on.  And on.

If only half of it were true, WOW.  Let's do it!

Huck  said it was the way GOD wanted taxes.


This was the opening of Fairtax web page, until we exposed the fraud. ....
.


____________________________________

It's like pretending to tax Moonbeams and Baby Farts. 

Taxing all Medicare patients, all city county and states,  etc, is like pretending to tax Moonbeams and Baby Farts. 

No they do NOT  show you they tax moonbeams and baby farts, but they needed to show 3.5 Trillion in revenue.    They do show 3.4 trillion in revenue.


The retail sales tax only brings in 1.4 trillion.


For 2.1 Trillion dollars of their supposed revenue, they may as will said we tax baby farts and moon beams. 

___________________________________


Yes, they tax retail sales. But that's only a small part of what they tax.  No Fairtax book, no Fairtax speech, no Fairtax video, has ever been honest about what they even tax.  

Quite the reverse -- they give the impression they are a very simple tax on retail sales. Personal retail sales. 

As you will see, the tax the state of Texas, a 23% tax on all wages, pensions and operational expenditures, for policemen, firemen, judges, prison personnel, etc etc etc.

If a Texas judge's salary and benefits are 200,000 a year, guess how much Texas is supposed to "remit" for that "expenditure.  About 46,000 dollars. 

Did you know that? Hell no.  Does Texas know that? Hell no.

And that's just the start.


A very very simple retail sales tax -- personal retail sales tax.



Huckabee and others "forgot" to mention that Fairtax is based on 2.1 trillion of impossible goofy taxes they had to hide in the fine print -- we show you where they hid it.

Turns out, that "sales tax"  is a tiny part of Fairtax. 

______________________________________________



SCIENTOLOGIST BEHIND FAIRTAX

Steven Hayes, according to Fairtax own web site, is the President of Fairtax.  It is a fund raising system.    A "former" scientologist, he tried to get Bruce Bartlett to sell Fairtax.

Hayes personally goes after the large donors.  Fairtax hustlers don't seem to be trying to pass the fraud, as much as get stupid people to pony up money that goes in their pockets.



HOUSTON  WE  HAVE A PROBLEM

"CLEAR ENOUGH ALREADY"

Steve Bennett-- an official spokesmen for Fairtax --- admits Fairtax has massive taxes on city county and states. He has to, it's in their fine print, and their math.

That's clear enough, says Bennett. 

City county and states, Bennett stupidly claims, will  readily spot these taxes and send them in.  No, I am not kidding. Bennett said city county and state officials "deal with fine print all the time".

They will see that fine print, they will get the money, and send it in.

How fucking stupid or foolish can Bennett be?  Answer -- that stupid.  

"If they have questions,"  Bennett told me, "they can ask." 


_______________________________

Why have those massive other taxes?
To make their math work on paper.
_______________________________

DO THEY REALLY EXPECT?

 Do they really expect NYC to send in 800 million?

Do they really expect the cancer victim on medicare to pay 30 or 40K in fed taxes?



Do they really expect Texas state legislature will send in 15 billion?

Do they really expect Keokuk Iowa to send in 22 million, or whatever it works out to be?


No.  They are not stupid.  Fairtax hustlers are not stupid at all.  They are lying bastards -- they had to include massive other taxes in the fine print, for their math to work. 


___________________________________


 A 100 million dollar city budget, means that city would owe 23 million dollars to the federal government.

Houston Texas, the city council, would owe over 180 million dollars.  And remember, Fairtax cleverly says they "assume" all city county and states will raise their taxes to pay it.

Yes, that's in the fine print.

So HOUSTON must pay over 180 million.  Houston is in Harris County. Harris County too, would owe massive taxes -- over 200 million.  

Harris county is in Texas.  Texas legislature would over over 15 billion.

Try to grasp how goofy this is, because Fairtax bastards never told anyone about this, in a clear way. Houston city council has no clue.
'
Harris County officials have no clue.

Texas legislature has no clue.

Do you really  think Houston, and all cities, Harris County, and all counties, Texas, and all states, are going to send in massive amounts of money?

_______________________________________________

BENNETT says it's clear enough 


Yet Bennett -- a nice guy, but apparently he is a lackey, a sucker, to Hayes -- says there is no problem.   All these taxes are very clear, to city county and states.

___________________________________________

"They read fine print all the time"  says Bennett, referring to states.   I asked Bennett when they are going to send notices to city county and states.  

Bennett says there is "no need" to explain this further to city county and states.    If they have questions, they can call him. 

Fairtax lying bastards do not even tell city and states where to send these massive amounts of money.  Which department?  

They don't say.   They just say "remit".  

On exactly which "expenditures"  must they pay 23% tax?  They only say "ALL EXPENDITURES"  other than education.  
___________________________________________

Just think of that. Your city "expends"  100 million, so your city must "remit"  as Fairtax cleverly says, 23 million to the fed..

And your county.

And your state. It's in their own documents.  Oh, you didnt read all their documents?

Here, this is my surprised look. 


No one told them.  NO ONE TOLD THEM.  Bennett, an official Fairtax spokesmen, admits no one told them -- and get this -- they  have no intention of telling them.

They can just read these very tricky bits of double talk, a few words here, a few there, and then send in the money!

Fairtax is comical farce, actually.   No, those who put this hustle together never intended it to pass.  




So Texas is going to see that double talk, and send in 16  or 18 billion dollars?   Really?

The rest are there to make it hard to notice those 300 words. 

THE "IN ADVANCE" PART 


Without exception sounds like a trivial detail  -- oh hell no. 


We "adopt a prepay approach"  is four of those 300 words. 

We "adopt"  a prepay approach, if you can even find that document, mind sound innocuous.

Clever definitions, exposed by President Bush Tax panel.

"CERTAIN WAGES"  are two of the 300 words that matter. 

And in a FOOTNOTE --- let me repeat that -- a FOOTNOTE -- Fairtax "assumes"  all city county and states will pay these massive taxes "in advance".

In advance. IN a footnote.

So, idiot Fairtax think Fairtax is a very very simple personal retail sales tax, but in the fine print are massive goofy and impossible other taxes.






Think Houston will see these footnotes in one document, see the definition of wages in another,  and send in over 100 million?.   





___________________________________________









EXPOSED ALREADY 
The basic thing Bush Tax Panel exposed, was that a retail sales tax, alone, would need to be more like 89%, not 23%.

If you ONLY tax personal retail sales tax, the rate must be near or even above, 89%.

And Fairtax hustlers will not disagree with that.  Cleverly, their plan is NOT a retail sales tax to replace all other taxes, but includes, in fact is really based mostly on, these massive other and impossible taxes.



Fairtax was exposed over a decade ago -- by President Bush Tax Advisory Panel.   Neal Boortz tried to sell President Bush this fraud -- and the president had it studied.  

It was not THAT hard to find the fraud, if you could find all Fairtax "documents".   


Fairtax told suckers, in books videos and speeches, that Fairtax was a "very very simple"  personal retail sales tax to replace all other fed taxes.

Only a very very simple retail sales tax "at point of purchase".   Sounded so good, right?

Take a closer look at the clever fine print...



Without exception.  They tax "consumption"  of all goods and services without exception.  Sounds like a normal thing to say.  Surely they mean retail consumption, personal sales, right?  

Until  you realize  Fairtax clever defintions and charts, have "consumption" mean bizarre and absurd things.   


Your city  PAYING OUT a pension or salary or unemployment claim -- that's a consumption?  Really? In Fairtax bizarro world of math and fine print, it is.   All that is "in the tax base" .   Tax base is, by definition, what they tax. 
\
All "expenditures" related to wages, pensions and benefits to all city county state and federal employees -- that's part of that consumption in their tax base.

So yes, they DO tax retail sales. But that's only a tiny part.

In other places, we show you, they have very important other words.  Like their definition of wages, and tax base.    See them below, and go look yourself.  It won't be that easy, because you probably don't know where their "research" documents even are. 

 HR25 has clever wording, that Fairtax hustlers very cleverly refer to, in their "research". 

_________________________________



SLICK BOORTZ BOOK


Yes, the federal government has to pay itself huge taxes, Boortz said.

Corporations can't pay taxes, Boortz said, but the federal government (and city county and state governments) can?


If there is any entity that can not pay taxes, because the cost is simply pushed to the tax payers, it's the government. 



 Military spending, research, etc, is in the tax base. They only "removed" education expenditures.

_________________________________

Not just some taxes, but MAJOR tax payer, said Boortz.  He immediately,  however, in the next sentence, tried to make it seem like the fed gov  just paid taxes on  retail purchases.  Boortz pulls this kind of trick so he can say "Hey, I told you on page 148, in an entire sentence, the fed government will be a major taxpayer". 

Boortz was paid to sell Fairtax to suckers. Yes, he was paid. 

_________________________________

MAJOR TAX PAYER

"under this system, the federal government itself becomes a major tax payer".





Corporations can't pay taxes, Boortz tells us.

But somehow, all city county and states can?

And Boortz -- look carefully at his book -- says proudly the federal gov will become a MAJOR TAXPAYER.  Boortz quickly adds, in the next sentence, the false impression this is a retail tax on the federal government.  By omission, he does not tell you all wages, pensions, capital investments, even by the federal government, is in the tax base, exactly as is all personal retail sales,etc.

They needed to do that, to make their math work.

Absurd as hell, so absurd most people do not notice.How would you notice. And yes, Fairtax math cleverly treats the money they would supposedly collect from city county and states, and from the fed gov, as spendable money.

They do NOT treat money they get from the federal government as an absurdity, but it is.  Fairtax has layers of absurdities, this is just one.  











___________________________________



ADDING UP ON PAPER
VS

REALITY






_________________________________

IT DOES NOT MATTER



Fairtax math is based on these absurdities.    And yes, they know it. 

_________________________________


Even tea party folks  know that an 89% sales tax is dumber than hell. 




Boortz is also the one that claimed all this research, and even  named Dale Jorgenson as the guy who proved so much about Fairtax.

Bullshit. Jorgenson specifically said Fairtax would NOT work, and could only theoretically work if everyone allowed their wages to be CUT.



That's right, Fairtax can not work unless ALL wage earners agreed to take massive wage CUTS.   Only if all workers agree to give their employer all the money they used to pay in taxes (an absurdity)  THEN -- and THEN only, could prices drop.

Do you really think all workers in the USA will donate -- yes donate -- what they used to pay in income taxes, to their employer, AND pay the highest sales tax on earth?   Because that is the research Jorgenson did.  He did not research what Fairtax has in their fine print, at all.



SHOW THE RESEARCH 
YOU ******* LIARS

In fact, if they can show 1 page of that research -- 22 million dollars of research about a very very simple personal retail sales tax, that proves it would replace all other fed taxes in "revenue neutral fashion" --- we will give them (or anyone) 50,000 dollars.  See more details below.

We first offered Boortz the 50K, and he could give it to any charity.  Boortz made a big deal of him being in a telethon for charity, where he took phone call pledges for 10 bucks.   And he refused to show one page of that 22 million dollars of research about the very simple personal retail sales tax?   Even when we would give that charity 50K?

Guess what?  Boortz knew there was no such research. He knew he was lying the whole time.

We now off that 50K to anyone who shows 1 page of that research.  See details below.

How hard can that be?  Show 1 page of that 22 million in research? 


Boortz, who is well aware of that, but a very good hustler, made Jorgenson sound like he proved all Boortz's fraudulent claims. But read his book carefully. He never EXACTLY says Jorgenson proved them, he just writes in a way that gives you that impression.

Likewise, Boortz never said Fairtax ONLY taxes personal retail sales, but he gives that overall impression.




JUST BUY USED STUFF

Voluntary, they said, because you choose!!

 Don't want to pay 8 thousand dollar fed tax on a new car?  Fine -- buy a used car.

Don't want to pay 90,000 fed tax on a new house? Okay, buy a used house.

Fairtax acted as if they were so honest,  "We are not pulling any punches"  said Boortz.  We are "the most transparent plan in history".


USED RENT?  USED SURGERY?

Ever hear of used rent. All rent is in the tax base.

Ever hear of used surgery? 

Used chemo?  

Used airline tickets?

Used cell phone service?


Used dental care?  See much used crowns, used dental implants, used X rays?

Ever see a USED Cat scan done?

Every hear of used gasoline? Used electricity?  Used cable or internet service?




  ALL THAT RESEARCH  !!  



  

 First of all, cancer victims would suddenly be on the hook for over 20 billion dollars of taxes.

But cancer taxes (nursing home taxes, medicine taxes, etc.)  are just the tip of the iceberg.   Fairtax math is goofy nonsense, because even when the tax is impossible to collect, Fairtax math lists that as revenue.  

All Medicare, and medicaid patients would -- again, without exception, per Fairtax math -- pay massive taxes, 30, 40, 50 thousand in taxes.

Why not just exempt cancer victims?    Because if they exempt cancer victims, they have to exempt heart disease patients, and nursing home residents.    Fairtax did not want suckers to even know of these huge other taxes.

If they exempted health care, that 23% tax rate goes to 40%.   And if they exempt other impossible to collect taxes, their tax rate goes to 50 and 60%.



They "removed"  from the tax base  wages paid to teachers, for example. But not wages paid to all other federal, city, county and state employees or retirees. And all retirement expenditures are in the tax base.


  All city county and state operational, wage, capital expenditures, are in the tax base. They never list it honestly, but below, you can see their art work.  The point here is, Fairtax would just have a "tax base" of retail sales, if that's all they taxed.






























"WE EVEN TAX THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT"




"The federal government itself will be a major taxpayer" 


"WE EVEN TAX THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT"



The fairtax book had one sentence about it -- way in the back of the book, and Boortz made sure it SEEMED like they just tax the government on retail sales. 

But they did tell you, remember? Sorta kinda?  IN that one sentence in one page, in a document you never saw?









CERTAIN WAGES...






So where -- really, where -- is their research??  They claim 22 million in research. In typical Boortz and Huckabee BS, they claim things  "the most researched economic plan in history" -- blah blah.

They don't have a page of actual research, not a page.  No, they don't.    What they have are silly double talk documents -- by their own public relations firm, Beacon Hill.   

Not only is that not research at all -- it didn't cost 22 million, and it's not about a very simple retail sales tax to replace all other fed taxes.



IF THEY WERE  HONEST...


If they were honest, they would not use some footnote to "assume"  over a trillion dollars in tax increases at state and local level.

You have to dig very very deep into their bullshit, to find such "assumptions".   But it's there. 






Their  overall message is they have this amazing retail sales tax, and prices drop, and "the only problem will be what to do with all the money"  said Neal  Boortz.

Mike Huckabee called this fraud a "magic wand"  in a campaign stop in 2012.  .   


DONT NEED THE RETAIL SALES TAX

Fairtax is SO goofy, that they don't even need the retail sales tax.     If the government could magically pay taxes to itself, go for it.   Their math is already based on 60% of their revenue coming from impossible sources.  Only 40% of Fairtax revenue would come from the retail sales.

So, just tax city county and states, and the federal government ONLY.  You would not need to tax anyone!

That is -- really -- how fucking goofy their scam is -- and they know it..    

Fairtax just threw in the retail sales tax -- remember, it's only a small part of the revenue -- to fool people.   They have  nothing but an absurdity.




WE ASKED -- SHOW US WHAT ANY CITY WOULD HAVE TO PAY

We have asked Fairtax spokesmen to provide an example of ANY city, state or county government, to show how much "fairtax"  that city would have to pay on their wages and operational expenditures.

There is no dispute all city county and states -- per Fairtax fine print -- have to pay a 23% tax on wage, pension, operational expenditures. 

So why not show us what any city has to pay, any county, any state?


It's not hard to figure -- just find all expenditures by any city (other than education wage expenditures)  and multiply by 23%.  So if St Louis has 100 million in wage and pension expenditures, St. Louis would owe  23 million in taxes to the fed gov.
 And Fairtax "assumes"  St Louis would raise their tax rate by 23%



They refuse. They absolutely refuse to show any city county or state, as an example.

The excuse they use?   "We don't have the time to show all cities and states financial information".   No one asked them to --- we just asked for one example. 




See this chart? It's from Fairtax lying bastards. You can say they are not lying because, somewhere, someway, on some page, in a deceptive way, they mention things a few word here or there.   But we believe it's lying, because the purpose of the sneaky word games, is to fool you. 

Notice anything?   Look closely.   Here is what they don't show you -- retail sales.  These numbers reflect much much more than personal retail sales. 

They tax, literally, by definition, everything in the tax base.

In the tax base is all retail sales, BUT ALSO all government wage and pension expenditures, other than those wages and pensions paid out to teachers.  So all that is taxed.



In the tax base, also, is all capital expenditures, paid out by all city county state and federal government. Yes -- they tax all city county and state, even federal government, capital investment.

That's well over 1 trillion dollars -- but they don't let you know that.  All city county and federal expenditures, are idiotically and absurdly "in the tax base" .

That's how their math works. They had to get their suckers to think their math added up.


Don't believe me?  Take a good look at page 148 of the Fairtax book.   There, Boortz  deliberately uses slick language,  but it's there. 


"The federal government itself will be a major taxpayer" 

While he did briefly mention that, in a sentence far in the back of one book, he never told you that all city county and states will have to pay, too -- massively. Not one word.

Nor did he tell you Fairtax HAD to insert massive goofy other taxes in the fine print, to make their math work. Nor did he tell you Scientology hustlers first came up with this fraud, but it fooled stupid people so well, guys like Boortz and Huckabee used it. Boortz was even paid to push this fraud. Yes, he was.
The retail part of Fairtax is not the problem -- the problem are the much much MUCH larger taxes they do not tell you about, except in tricky fine print or double 

_____________________________________


TAX BASE TRICKS


They DID tell you -- in one sentence, in one sentence, in a document you are likely never to see,  that they tax whatever NIPA defines as governmental or persona "consumption expenditures"



And look at this - a footnote, a footnote -- in a fairtax document.  Did we mention footnote?



Footnote tricks.  


This footnote cleverly mentions that they "adopt" a "prepayment approach" to taxing government "investments". 


 Turns out those "investments" they tax in advance, include wages, pensions, capital expenditures. Yes -- capital expenditures!  They tax capital expenditures.

Let me repeat that.  If your city, your county or your state, make capital investments, like build a library, repair a sewer system,  or even pay into the police and fireman pension system, that is all taxed.  Much of it, in advance.


IN ADVANCE.  Let that sink in.  They tell us that -- in a footnote.  A footnote.  Let me repeat that, a footnote.



You did not even know they taxed wages, pensions, capital investments, did you.


In advance or not, they never told you.  Never hinted at it.

You have to read their fine print, CLOSELY.

So to you still think Fairtax is a simple personal retail sales tax?  


Boortz is fond of saying Fairtax is "totally transparent"  because "you will see your tax on your cash register receipt".   Fucking lying piece of shit. He really is, a lying piece of shit, on this and many things.


Oh yes, a small part of Fairtax is that retail sales tax.


 But most of Fairtax has nothing to do with retail sales or cash registers, like the tax on capital investments and wages and operational expenditures, in advance or otherwise. 




And -- likewise, in documents  you never see, in very slick double talk, they do too you sorta -- huge tax increases at city county and state levels.  



"We assume that state and local governments take the necessary measures ..... in this setting means raising their tax rates..."
 So they do tell you kinda, but in a way you never even see or understand.  Elsewhere the lying pieces of shit tell you it's a very simple retail sales tax.  No, it's not.   It's really huge impossible other taxes these lying bastards wrote in fine print, that are goofy as hell.  And they knew it.   This was a Scientology bit of wacko -- and former Scientologist still use it to fool stupid people, and get money from them, to "support Fairtax"


____________________________________




________________________________________________________________________
  THEY HAD TO DO THEIR FRAUD THIS WAY -- TO MAKE THEIR MATH WORK  
__________________________________________________________________________


Why didn't people notice this? Yes it's clever, but it's in the book on page 148.



_____________________________________


CAN THE FED GOV BECOME A MAJOR TAXPAYER?

Fairtax often tells their suckers crap like "corporations don't pay taxes, they just pass them along to you."

Yet cleverly, the lying bastards have massive taxes on all city county and states -- MASSIVE taxes.

Corportations don't pay taxes, they said.

Only people pay taxes.

Yet they have city county and state governments paying massive taxes. And you idiots didn't notice.

I noticed.  So did others.

But Fairtax suckers, most of them trained  by being in the South and being religious, did not notice. That's fascinating to me, while the religious folks, and Southern folks, were so easily hustled.

I was fooled to, but I kept reading and asking questions, which they avoided like the plague.



Also, laughably, all Social Security spending, all Medicare spending, is in the tax base. Remember that.  They actually defund Social Security, there is no longer any taxes for Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid.  But in their absurd fine print tricks, they tax that consumption anyway.  

____________________________________



Did Huckabee ever tell you that?  Massive taxes on the poor. Massive taxes on city county and states.

They assume all city county and state taxes will go up -- WAY UP.

It's in the fine print.





________________________________________________________________________
  THEY HAD TO DO THEIR FRAUD THIS WAY -- TO MAKE THEIR MATH WORK  
__________________________________________________________________________


____________________________________________

TAX BASE = WHAT THEY TAX 

NO EXCEPTIONS -- REMEMBER THAT

ALL CANCER SURGERY IS IN THE TAX BASE

ALL CITY COUNTY AND STATE WAGE/ PENSION EXPENDITURES TOO 






These words -- without exception -- and NIPA -- may seem normal boilerplate legalese. Not a big deal?

While Fairtax never tells suckers (of course) that they tax all cancer victims, they do tax all cancer victims, rich or poor, old or young -- their math is based on it.

That's the thing people don't notice -- their math is based on collecting massive other taxes. Their math has the retail sales in the tax base- - but also much, much, much more.

These other taxes are part of the very clever "NIPA" based consumption. And they did it that way to fool you. Yes, they did.

_______________________________________________

ALREADY EXPOSED POLITELY 

Fairtax fraud was already exposed politely, as you will see.  President Bush Tax Advisory Panel, led by William Gale, PhD Stanford, had no trouble spotting the  fraud. They used academic and polite language, they did not call Fairtax lying bastards a fraud, at least in public.

But in private, William Gale said --"they lie a lot".  
_______________________________________________


Essentially, the tax panel found the fine print tricks, and showed that a retail sales tax -- taxing ONLY retail sales --- would be more like 89%, not 23%.


Fairtax made their math work by inserting massive OTHER taxes, impossible goofy taxes, on top of, in addition to, and paid separately from, the retail sales tax.

Remember this: without the fine print tricks I show you --- Fairtax rate would be more like 89%.  That's not what I said, that's what the math shows, and what President Bush Tax Panel found.

The tax panel could find the fine print easily enough -- but they eat fine print for breakfast and spit it out for lunch.  

Plus, they had ALL the documents, and did not care about slogans.  The slogans are, to be blunt, bullshit lies. Yes,  lies.  It's the fine print that matters. 


_______________________________________________


But no one paid much attention to that polite and academic way of exposing this fraud.  In private, William Gale said "they lot a lot" -- but not in public.

 So Im blunt. And in public,   Here is a picture of me. 



The fraud is this -- massive impossible other taxes, far larger than the retail sales tax.   The retail sales tax is not the problem.


_______________________________________________



Look at their "other taxes" -- impossible other taxes -- these lying bastards hid in the fine print. We show the fine print.   Yes they do have a retail sales tax,  but much  higher taxes ON TOP of that retail sales tax.

 THE OTHER TAXES ARE FAR LARGER

     AND IMPOSSIBLE

     AND YES, THE LYING BASTARDS KNOW IT

Yes, they tell you its a very simple retail sales tax.

All the examples they give -- are about retail sales.

Never once do they give you an example of a tax on a cancer victim. Never once do they mention the massive taxes on wage and pension and operational "expenditures".

But those things are in their fine print- - and cleverly in a sneaky way, in their math.

Did Huck ever mention that  wages and pensions and operational expenditures, paid out by all cities a retail sale are taxed.

For example, did Huck say Dallas Texas would owe well over 100 million dollars in fed taxes for their wage pension and capital investment "expenditures"?

 HELL NO.  

Why not?  Because he does not want you to know.  Huck is a sneaky lying bastard -- yes he is. He didn't invent this fraud, and maybe he didn't know at first, but he knows now. And he isn't about to tell his suckers.

  The innocent supporters were never told this. They are just duped.  Once they know they fraud, they of course do not support it, because Fairtax is  not just flawed, it's impossible. Not sorta impossible, not kind of impossible.   It's totally impossible.  The lying bastards are the ones that up the fraud together.

But in Fairtax fraud, they do indeed have 31% (or 23%) tax on all wage and pension and operational expenditures, paid OUT by your city. And another tax on all such expenditures paid out, by our county.

And another tax on all such expenditures, paid out, by your state.

That's how their math adds up, and the lying bastards do have that in their documents, in a very deceptive way, but it's there.

So if Chicago pays OUT 1 billion in wages, pensions, capital investments, operational expenditures, Chicago would (per Fairtax anyway) have to pay 230 million or more in taxes.

Expand tax base sounds so great, right?  Uh, well that's true -- but what does it really mean? 

Fairtax never tell what this means.... like massive cancer taxes.....do you really think a cancer victim should have to pay 30 or 35,000 dollars in fed taxes, just because they got sick?   Oh, they didn't tell you about cancer taxes?? 

Surprise surprise!






___________________________________________



And massive taxes on city county and states.  The city of New York, for example, would owe over 750 BILLION.  That's right, BILLION.  Let me repeat that -- 750 billion.





___________________________________________


Your city county and state -- are supposed to raise tax rates. That's in their OWN document, if you read all their documents, very very closely.   See for yourself!




___________________________________________

Every city, every county, every state, massive taxes. No, not just a tax on retail purchases, that's nothing. City county and states are taxed 31% on wage expenditures, pension expenditures, operational expenditures.


And cleverly -- they never tell you in books, videos or speeches -- your city (and state and county) are supposed to raise their tax rates.   In books, speeches and videos, these lying bastards make it seem like a very very simple retail sales tax.  Total bullshit, and they know it.






___________________________________________


WHY?  Why have these massive (2 trillion +) taxes, much higher than the retail sales tax on persons?   If they only taxed retail sales, they would have to charge 89%. 

That's right, if they didn't lie about what they tax (they do tell you in fraudulent way, in fine print, we still call that lying)  they would have to show an 89% tax rate.

They didn't dare show anyone an 89% tax rate!  Even Tea Party idiots know an 89% retail sales tax is crazy.

So, Fairtax hustlers inserted massive other taxes, a few words here, a few assumptions there, a few clever defintions -- like definition of a person!!  

DEFINITION OF A PERSON -- DEFINITION OF WAGES






Clever, and fraudulent crap. If they did anything like this is a legal contract, you could sue the bastards.  But this is political theater -- you can't sue lying bastards for political bullshit. 


____________________________________________
   NIPA   

"CONSUMPTION  EXPENDITURES "

WORD GAMES
____________________________________________ 
NIPA -- Fairtax math is based on this "tax all consumption expenditures"  of all personal and government expenditures, per what NIPA defines as consumption.    

Not just retail sales tax. Retail sales is only a small part of it.  They tax 31% (not 23) of whatever NIPA defines as  "personal or governmental consumption expenditures."




Very clever.    They never tell you about these other taxes, because it's all impossible buillshit. You can not possibly tax, for example, NYC 800 billion dollars because you hid some crap in a few words in a footnote.

Too complicated?  Literally, they hide a few words here, a few words there, then they add up the 2 Trillion dollars of those taxes, and claim it's all "researched"

The "research" does not even exist, except this fraud.   See our 50,000 dollar offer for anyone (even you) who can show one page of that 22 million of Fairtax research about that very very simple personal retail sales tax.

They have no research at all -- they have documents they tell suckers is "research" -- but that where these bastards have the fraud!   Hiding your fraud in some tricky fine print, is not research.





You thought Fairtax was a tax on purchases. Oh hell no. That's just a tiny part.  We show you their math and fine print.

  "EXPANDING THE TAX BASE" sounds great, right?

Expand?  Hilarious.   Exapand the "tax base"  ?   

What does that mean?


How is cancer surgery taxed? They never mention cancer, or health care, at all.   

But all such "consumption expenditures" are "in the tax base".

They tax whatever "NIPA" defines as personal or governmental "consumption expenditures".   Health care, and virtually every possible thing, is in that goofy definition.


They had to tax all health care, and all governmental expenditures, including wage, pension, and capital investment expenditure,  to make the math work.  On paper. 


We show you how Fairtax used these words -- their own words -- to insert 2.1 trillion dollars of "other taxes" into Fairtax.

It means massive goofy impossible taxes -- taxes on Medicare patients (huge taxes)  and taxes on every city county and state on their wage pension and operational expenditures.


Did you know -- yes or no -- that Fairtax math and fine print, have MASSIVE taxes (over 800 million dollar tax) on New York City alone!   Dallas Texas city council would owe over 180 million.

No, not just a tax on retail sales -- city county and states, are taxed on "wage and pension  expenditures".   

And much more.   

And these lying bastards do not tell you -- anyplace -- in a clear way. Instead, these lying bastards use "fine print tricks"  we show you.  It's there -- but most people could not find it, unless shown.

So, we show you.
As  you will see, rich or poor, even folks on Medicare,  are supposed to somehow pay this huge tax on their cancer surgery "consumption"   That is how these lying bastards get the "math" to add up.   






Neal Boortz -- on FOX news -- had to admit, even breast  cancer victims will have to pay that tax (31%, though he claims 23%).

Boortz said "Oh -- we will save her so much, it won't matter."  Then he quickly changed the subject.

So yes, these lying bastards do know they have massive taxes on cancer victims -- and much much more.  Boortz was always one of the more blatant lying bastards.   But he was paid, and it worked great in Georia, his fan base.  Seems those dumb asses will believe any self confident bastard like Boortz.

And Boortz is very very good at lying. 




Boortz and Huck will save her so much, that a 30,000 fed tax on cancer surgery and chemo, wont matter?

Remember, a Medicare patient does not pay for her surgery and chemo and rehab. Most of that is "picked up by Medicare".

So why the fuck is all that "consumption"  in the tax base?

We already told you, to make their math add up.

Leukemia victims too -- all health care is "in the tax base".  As you 



Do you think the parents of a child with leukemia should be taxed 40,000 dollars because they "consumed" 180,000 dollars of health care for their child?

No -- and Fairtax doesn't believe that crap either, but  all such "consumption" is in their tax base, meaning they rely on the parents, and everyone else, and all city county and states, to pay, and pay massively.





Fairtax needed these massive "other taxes"  to make their fraudulent math work.   The sales tax, by itself, would not bring in nearly enough.  

If they ONLY taxed retail sales -- the tax rate would need to be 89%, as shown by President Bush Tax Panel...

They tell you in 1000 ways, in books, in examples, in videos, they are a very simple sales tax.  Such bullshit -- only a small part of Fairtax is that personal retail sales tax.


They tax retail sales, sure do.  But that's only a tiny part of Fairtax. 

They also have 2.1 trillion dollars of NIPA taxes -- we show you how they got that, into the fine print, and into the math.

_________________________________________________
   NIPA ??     WTF??  








_______________________________________________

DOES HUCK KNOW?

To defend Huck, he may not know. 

From comments he made, he spoke to "fairtax economist".   That's like talking to Bernie Madoff, when he swindled some of the richest people in the world out of about 400 million dollars.

You have to see the fine print.

Fairtax was exposed repeatedly -- President Bush Tax Panel issued a polite report, not calling it a fraud in public, but in private, William Gale, PhD Stanford said "they lie a lot".

Indeed they do.

President Bush Tax Panel exposed it politely, in academic terms.  We expose it for the exact same reasons - only we are not polite.

_________________________________________________

A "very very simple"  retail sales tax, Boortz told us.

Oh really?

22 million in research about this "very simple" personal retail sales tax to replace all other fed taxes?

Where is that "research" please.

_________________________________________________


There is no such research, and I offer 50K if you can show one page of it. See below of complete details of this legal offer.
___________________________________________

Do you even know what NIPA is?

THEY TAX WHATEVER  NIPA DEFINES AS CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURES

SO YOU BETTER KNOW WHAT  NIPA   IS

NO, ITS NOT AN AUTOPARTS STORE 


____________________________________________


   NIPA -- CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURES -- NO EXCEPTIONS WHATSOEVER



To get the 3.5 Trillion -- when a sales tax would only bring in 1.4 trillion --- they  had to be very sneaky.  So they were.








2.1 Trillion dollars of their revenue, has nothing to do with normal retail sales to human beings.

____________________________________________



WORD GAMES

NIPA = BFD



____________________________________________

Do you even know what NIPA is?

It's a BFD  -- very BFD -- in Fairtax, which is why they never told you.

You have to get it from their "research" documents.  Hilariously, they created a few documents, called it research, and stuck their fraud, in their own "research" 

____________________________________________

ENTER BUSH TAX PANEL


Neal Boortz, and others, visited President Bush, and pushed Fairtax bullshit to him.  They told him the same shit - 22 million in research, a very very simple retail sales tax. 


President Bush had his "Tax Panel" look over Fairtax.

The "tax panel"  did not give a shit what Boortz said, nor what the slogans were. The slogans always sound great.

The tax panel, instead, READ THE FINE PRINT.

Brilliant idea, right?  Read the fine print. 

____________________________________________

Eat fine print for breakfast,
                         spit it out for lunch.

The Bush tax panel,  however, got ALL the fine print. All the documents, all the charts, definitions, all the "NIPA" material, everything.

And they didn't give a shit what the slogans were.

What they found was that, without these massive other impossible taxes, Fairtax rate would be 89%.   

Only -- only -- by adding all these "other taxes" -- like taxes on all city county and states, like taxing all cancer victims impossibly high taxes -- can they claim the fraudulent 23%









William Gale found the massive other taxes, as did we and others, just by reading ALL the fine print, very closely.  You also have to ignore the slogans, which give the opposite impression.





Most people just assume Fairtax slogans are the same as the fine print. Not even close.  

____________________________________________



They told you all "consumption expenditures," and they told you without exception.  But that's only in the fine print in documents you never see -- a few words here, a few words there.

Yes, it is lying,  in our definition of lying, because they made you assume that meant all retail sales. They told you that, gave many examples of that.   Only in the fine print, very cleverly inserted, do they have these impossible other taxes.

 We call that lying, we call it a fraud, but you can call it what you want.







 DId they research this?  

For five years now, I offered 50,000 dollars for one page of that research about a very simple personal retail sales tax of 23% to replace all other fed revenue.

 How hard can it be? Just show ONE page of that 22 million in research?

Where is the "research" that shows this woman above, with 10K income, can possibly pay 32,000 dollars in fed taxes on her cancer surgery??

Where is it?



  Remember -- they "assume" all city county and states will "raise their tax rates" to pay it.  That's THEIR OWN document.  Remember that. But they never even hint that in books, videos and speeches.
Assume - weasel word for we pretend.




  CITIES TOO -- ON WAGES AND PENSIONS 

There is nothing in all Fairtax documents explaining how the hello a cancer victim can possibly pay 30K fed tax, when their entire income might be 10K.

Yet, all cancer victims, without exception, are taxed and more importantly, that is how their math adds up, as if all cancer victims would actually pay.  No, they won't pay. They can't pay. 

Cities COULD theoretically pay -- but they won't.  No one told them. This is only in a few clever sentences, a few words, in documents they have online, and never show anyone in a candid clear way.

Like this document -- Footnote 19. WTF?



They adopt a what?  A prepay approach? 

What the hell does that even MEAN?   They adopt a pre-pay APPROACH?

Are you kidding? No -- they were not kidding, they were using bullshit. Adopt a pre-pay approach is goofy BS, and they avoided being specific. 

Pre-pay or not,  how the hell are these  capital expenditures, "retail sales taxes".  

They are taxes on what a city pays OUT for wages and pensions. Pay OUT 1 million dollars in wages, your city would owe 310,000 dollars in Fairtax.   

Even pension expenditures are taxed like that. Yes, they tax all city county and state wage and pension expenditures.  Not just retail sales purchased by people.

Try to grasp that. 

 It's in the fine print, and that is how their math adds up.  Without these massive other taxes, Fairtax math is a joke. It's a joke anyway, a fraud, but this is how they jigger the find print and fool you.

Don't blame me -- blame them.   They did it. 






And footnote 19-- payable in advance....... they "adopt a prepayment approach"  for taxing all capital expenditures.

Not just capital expenditures,  but all operational expenditures too, all wage expenditures, all pension expenditures -- all taxed 31%.

That's what their math is based on.

WTF? Adopt a prepay approach??  Gawd these guy had to be laughing their asses off.  Really. Prepay or not, this is goofy stuff, impossible nonsense.  But they had to do it, to make their math work, on paper. 


REST OF THE STORY......  FINE PRINT 

Yes they do tax retail sales.   That's not the problem.  But retail sales, taxed 23%, would only bring in about 1.4 Trillion.

They need to bring in 3.5 Trillion.   To make that "happen" on paper, they had to tax all city county and states on all expenditures -- wages, pensions, capital investments.

_____________________________________________
Fairtax is not just on retail sales -- retail sales are  only a tiny part of it.





Fairtax fair?  Great name, great slogans.

Great big fraud.... It's  not even rational.

That's why I'd love the bastards to pass it.

They do not dare, and they do not want, to pass their own fraud.


_____________________________________________ 






_____________________________________________

WHO IS BEHIND FAIRTAX FRAUD?

Grover Norquest pushed Fairtax first -- then suddenly stopped.  Same thing with CATO.  They pushed it, suddenly stopped.  We don't know why.

Did they finally read the fine print?

Who is behind Fairtax now? Who paid Boortz? Who paid Beacon Hill (see below)?

Hard to tell, it might be this guy.  Someone had to pay these folks -- especially Beacon Hill. They are a public relations company, they do not work for free.

Who paid them?   We don't know!   Might be Steven Hayes.

Scientology & Fairtax



_____________________________________________


Fairtax web site shows Steven Hayes is the top in "Leadership".

A former Scientologist, it seems to us he is  more of a grifter -- raising money.   Not that folks don't often try to raise money to enrich themselves, for some dubious cause they know is nonsense. And that's fine.   It's political theater, not necessarily fraud.

Raising money on political hustles is legal, as far as we know. 

But Hayes gets the money from folks who probably believe Fairtax is a very simple personal retail sales tax,  and that he has, or someone has, all this amazing research.  No, they have NO research, none, on this very very simple personal retail sales tax of 23% to replace all other fed taxes.

They claim they will replace Medicare taxes, Social security taxes, all income taxes, etc etc etc, with this very simple retail sales tax, and they KNOW that's a fucking lie, because they put these massive other taxes -- impossible goofy absurd bullshit other taxes -- in the fine print.

It's not a personal retail sales tax, it's not even a tax code. It's political theater. 




"WE ASSUME "  ALL CITY COUNTY AND STATE TAX RATES WILL HAVE TO GO UP 

  ---  IT'S ONLY IN THE FINE PRINT ---








___________________________

Did you know your city would have massive tax obligation on wages, pensions, capital investments, operational expenditures?

NYC over 600 million. Well over.  Chicago, over 200 million. Dallas, over 180 million.

And no one told them.

Did you know?

HELL NO --  you didn't know.  How would you know, they never say so.   

In 15 years,  not once, not in any speech, any book, any video, do they even hint at these massive taxes on capital investment expenditures, on wage and pension expenditures.

But -- their math depends on it.  Those are the NIPA based taxes.


It's cleverly in their fine print.  Only in the fine print tricks.  Not in their books, videos or speeches.


How would that work?  And yes, wages and pension "expenditures" are taxed.  Capital investment is taxed -- in advance. Read the fine print!!!







23% or 31%   is not the issue.   How the hell are the wages paid out by all city county and states, a "retail sale"?



_____________________________________________

Do you even know what NIPA is?

NIPA   is a BFD in Fairtax.  

Nothing is bigger. Nothing.  NIPA is a set of tables Bureau of Economic Activity uses.

Fairtax taxes everything in those tables

In those tables -- all city county and state wages, pensions and capital expenditures.

All "consumption" --- not just purchases.  All "consumption"  of chemo, nursing home care, etc, is in the tax base.


To make their math work, they had to run this scam, this way. 

 Fairtax taxes not just retail sales, but whatever is in those tables.  And there arent 2 Fairtax suckers on earth, that know that.    

They told you -- yes they did. In that document, online. Never told you in the books, never told you in the videos. Never told you in the speeches.

ONLY  -- ONLY -- in the very very clever fine print.

 We show you what they call research....

We offer -- seriously -- 50,000 dollars to the first person who can show 1 page of that 22 million dollars of Fairtax research about this "very very simple" 23% personal retail sales tax that replaces all other fed taxes.

See details bottom of this site.






_____________________________________________


Can the breast cancer victim  possibly pay 30,000 dollars in fed taxes on this cancer surgery and chemo?

No -- her income is less that 20K, and she isn't even working.

Yet, Fairtax math is based on her, and all cancer victims, paying huge taxes.

_____________________________________________



   AN ABSURDITY   

The retail sales tax is not the problem. That's fine. The massive other "NIPA" based taxes are the problem.



_____________________________________________





All of these  NIPA taxes

 -- without exception. 



 They told you, right?  Can't say they didn't tell you.

Because in the fine print -- they sorta did.  A few words here, a few there, an "assumption"  and a definition.   


Is it their fault you believed the books, videos and speeches, instead of the fine print?


_____________________________________________


Just like their "calculator" trick is deliberate as hell.

Click here to see their calculator fraud









Don't believe they tax wages, paid out by all city county and states. Oh yes, but they do that so slyly. 

President Bush Tax Panel had  no problem, they eat fine print tricks for breakfast.

But the average sucker never had a chance, even if they found the fine print documents.  Because they never tell their own suckers, in once place, at one time.






___________________________________________


Or buy used!!

One of the more vile speeches by Fairtax hustlers, is the speech about "just buy used".  You decide what your fed tax will be!

Ever hear of used chemo? 

Ever hear of used heart bypass surgery?

Ever hear of used rent?

Ever hear of used food?

Ever hear of used prescription drugs?

Thats all taxed.

WITHOUT EXCEPTION.

_____________________________________________


USED WAGES?

And remember -- city county and states have to pay Fairtax on wage, pension, operational expenditure.

So how are city, county, and states supposed to avoid it?  Used wages?  Used pensions?  Used capital investments?  All those are taxed too, not just retail sales. 

__________________________________________
Do Fairtax hustlers hate cancer victims?

 No, of course not. Nor do they expect to tax the woman above a dime, much less 32,000 dollars.  But they had to put bullshit like that in their hustle, to make the math "work". 
__________________________________________ 










Huck is not the only one that fell for the hustle -- at one time, Fairtax had 100 sponsors in Congress. Hilariously, they never could get this out of "committee" though they ran the committees.

Ever wonder why?   They had both houses of Congress. 100 sponsors. All this research.   And could not get a vote on it, in their OWN committees, with their OWN people in charge.

Here is why -- they knew it was a fraud.   Yes, they always knew. 
_____________________________________________


Words are important.  

But they never told you about 600 million dollar tax on NYC or a 30,000 tax an a breast cancer victim.





_________________________________________



Huck called Fairtax  "a magic wand" .



__________________________



EXPOSED POLITELY 
10 YEARS AGO....








___________________________





___________________________

But Fairtax claims they will replace all other fed taxes.   To replace all other fed taxes, it would take a tax rate of 80-89%.  Not 23.





A federal sales tax of 35% or so, COULD replace all income taxes -- but Fairtax claims they replace all fed taxes.  Remember that. But a 40% sales tax is stupid as hell, and no one is going to pass that.

______________________________

UNTAXES POOR? HOW


Fairtax claims it "completely untaxes the poor". 

No, there are no exceptions whatsoever, no matter how rich or poor. Fairtax math is based on that.

Yes, there is a supposed "prebate" -- which would cost 700 billion dollars.  Everyone gets a check -- huge entitlement program, by the way.



But if you have cancer, your fed tax would easily by 40,000 dollars. Your prebate does not change -- it's still 200 a month.



So how the hell is a cancer victim supposed to pay 30 or 40K in fed taxes, with a prebate of 200?







Neal Boortz never told about "tax base"  did he?



Mike Huckabee never mentioned it.    

Operational expenditures for prisons are in the tax base.

Capital expenditures are in the tax base.

Wages paid out by city county and states, are in the tax base.  Tax base = what they tax.
_______________________________




Why not just exempt city county and states? 


 Because if they did, the tax rate would have to be 45-50%.  


Why not exempt health care expenditures?


Because if they did, the tax rate would go to 60-65%.


If they ONLY taxed retail sales, the tax rate would be 80-89%.
When you "exempt"  anything the tax rate has to go up.  Fairtax has 2.1 Trillion dollars of "other taxes"  that have nothing to do with personal retail sales taxes. 
_____________________________

 EXPOSED SCIENTOLOGY CONNECTION 




MORE LIKE 100%

The head of Fairtax hustle -- tried to get Bruce Bartlett to push Fairtax.

Former Scientologist.  Full time grifter?


Bruce Bartlett, in National Review, relied on the fine print to point out, Fairtax would actually be over 100%--because the 80-89% would be just federal sales  tax. 

The cities, county, and states have their OWN sales taxes.

So -- if Fairtax somehow passed, and they only taxed retail sales, the tax rate would be wacko high.  No -- Fairtax does not intend to pass their own fraud.  It was always political theater, not a tax code. 

______________________________________________________________




Bartlett also pointed out -- Scientologist hustlers contacted him, to have him push Fairtax.  Bartlett showed, on CBS, that Fairtax was connected with Scientology.  Indeed, it is.

The head of Fairtax,  Steven Hayes, is  former Scientologist, who appears to be something of a grifter, for Fairtax.  He raises money to "promote" Fairtax.  From things he wrote, it seems Steven wants the "big donors" to himself


Are Hayes and others actually trying to pass Fairtax?

No. Not at all, apparently.  

 They love the issue, however.   They love to raise money from suckers, on the basis of being a "very simple" retail sales tax.

As you can see, by the absurd fine print tricks, Fairtax is anything but a simple retail sales tax.

________________________________________

OVER 100%

Bartlett showed that city county and states would also have "sales taxes"  on top of that, putting the real-world rate over 100, to a customer walking in a store to buy a jacket or couch.  

Did Fairtax hustlers KNOW this?

OF COURSE they knew. They knew this the entire time, it's the hustlers who put in the fine print tricks.

I doubt Huckabee knows any of this -- nor does he seem to care.   Huck would be an idiot to push something that, if passed, would make him leave the country in shame.

Did anyone tell Huck about these massive other taxes?  To hear Huck speak, Fairtax is almost magical, and just a very simple tax on retail sales.

Bartlett knew -- President Bush Tax Panel knew.  But Fairtax fine print tricks are so clever, you'd have to be much smarter than most people to notice, and you would have to discard the bullshit by Boortz, the Fairtax books, etc. You'd have to ONLY go by the fine print and math.



Fairtax hustlers tried to get Bartlett to push Fairtax.   Instead he exposed them.
______________________________


SIMPLE?

FUNNY STUFF IN THEIR "RESEARCH"












Do you think they "researched"   these absurd other taxes? Did they "research" that all city county and states will send in massive amounts of money on their wage expenditures?

Hell no -- they didn't research it, they never even explained it, but  rather hid it, in a few clever "assumptions" and word tricks.


Quite the opposite of research.

Just these few new hires in the fire department for Mesquite AZ would require that city pay over 200,000 in taxes on their wage expenditures.

Do you think Mesquite AZ is going to send in 200,000 in taxes on the wage expenditures they paid these men? HELL NO.  First of all, Mesquite has no way of knowing.

There is literally no way for any city county or state to even KNOW this, unless they can piece together the hustle -- and no, they are not going to even do that, much less send the money in.

Whoever funded this hustle, paid Beacon Hill to put out clever papers -- they call research.  Bullshit, they can call their dog research, but it's still a dog.

Did Beacon Hill lie? Well, they were very very clever, in their fine print tricks, like their "assumptions" and definitions.

Yes they lied their damn ass off, in terms of misleading you.   But if you read every word, every footnote, every definition very very carefully, you could say they did not lie. You'd be wrong, depending on your definition of lie. 

______________________________

Where is the research about these massive taxes on city county and states???



Hiding goofy absurdities in your :"research"  documents is quite the opposite of actual research.  

___________________________________________________



WE ASKED FOR RESEARCH  

Thats why we have asked for one page of research about this very simple personal retail sales tax to replace all other fed taxes.

We even offered -- and still do offer -- 50,000 dollars for one page of such research. They  have none. This is a fraud. Your own bs papers hiding the fine print tricks is not research.
______________________________








The retail tax is not the problem..... the problem, the absurdity, are the massive impossible other taxes, like taxes on city county and states. 
_______________________________________

SLOGANS FOOL STUPID PEOPLE

EVERY DAMN TIME.......


FLAT TAX IS A FRAUD TOO... they won't even put out fine print, tricks or not.  They only have slogans. 

Flat tax is NOT flat. No -- it's not flat at all. The name is flat, they pretend they have a flat tax, but look closely, they fool you too!




Names. Flat tax  is a wonderful name, but the flat tax put out by CATO, Newt Gingrich,  and everyone else, isn't flat.

 That's just the damn NAME.  



Flat tax scam is this -- only certain types of income, will they even call "income"

They don't tax, at all, most of Mitt Romney's income.

Romney himself pointed this out -- and he was correct.  A flat tax (so called) would eliminate almost all his taxes!

That's right, just don't call certain types of income, "income"  Then tell suckers it's flat.

But they will get up there, fool the stupid time after time after time with slogans like this.

See why those lying bastards don't have fine print? At least Fairtax put out fine print -- tricky as hell, lying bastards, but they put out something you can actually see.  Stupid people didn't bother to read it closely, but smart people could if they wanted to.

Flat tax ONLY has slogans.
_________________________________





____________________________________








For a quicker way to see their fraud -- see their "calculator trick".  Same deception, just on this calculator fraud.Calculator fraud -- see how they did it



_______________________________






See the part about "total consumption??   Retail sales is only part of that.



   BALDERDASH    

  MOONBEAM AND BABY FART TAX   


Fairtax is like taxing moonbeans and baby farts in the fine print.

It does not matter what words they use -- these other taxes are impossible, and they knew it.    They can no more tax all cancer victims than they can tax moonbeams.



_______________________________






_________________

  FINE PRINT ABSURDITIES   



_______________________________

You will never see Fairtax do a side by side comparison of before -after Fairtax, listing all consumption.

You are about to find out why.


Because Joe  had so much consumption (mostly due to medical consumption) his Fairtax would be 57,000 or more.

But even without that surgery, Joe's fed tax would be 300% higher, under Fairtax.



But even without the medical consumption - if Joe's wife never had a health issue -- his federal tax would STILL be over 20,000 dollars, an increase of 300%

_______________________________

You can't be taxed over 100% of your income. But that's just the point. Fairtax is goofy. Fairtax would indeed, if enacted, depend on millions of people paying more tax they they had income, because millions of people "consume" things like expensive health care.


Do Fairtax hustlers care? No.  They don't expect this fraud to pass, it was never meant to pass.  It's a  hustle, they get people to give them money. 

_______________________________





_______________________________



______________________________



 If you only taxed retail sales, that could logically and realistically be taxed, the tax rate would be closer to 89%.

_____________________________








_______________________________





_____________________________




Maybe you heard Neal Boortz wants an hour with President Obama to pitch the Fairtax.

Boortz has run this hustle before -- and actually met with President Bush. President Bush had his tax panel study it, and they found what we showed above -- Fairtax is a fraud. They didn't say the word fraud in public, but they did show that without these massive goofy other things "in the tax base" -- the tax rate would need to be 89%





NO MORE FUNDING
__________________________________


Most absurd -- Fairtax simply gets rid of all funding for social security and medicaid.  Hilarious really.

There are no more tax revenues to fund Social Security, in Fairtax. None. Not one dime.

They just get rid --100% gone -- of all taxes paid into Social Security and Medicaid.  

Don't worry, they claim.  There will be more than enough coming in from general revenue of that "sales tax" pay for everything.





So, how do they pay for social security and medicare - medicaid?   Good question.  

They don't pay for it. 
__________________________________

Where is Fairtax research?





These documents from Beacon Hill are in no way research, and are not about a very simple personal retail sales tax.





Beacon Hill office claim to be an "education organization".  Well if selling you a hustle is educational, okay.

They do public relations, they support whatever they are paid to support.   We show you their very clever documents.  That's were the hustle is -- in their own documents. 



Someone put a lot of money into Fairtax -- and they paid Boortz, and Beacon Hill, plus for buses, and "education" web sites.   The "Fairtax calculator" fraud, was paid by the same  hustlers.







Boortz said someone offered him a jet like this to fly him around and push Fairtax.  We don't know who paid Boortz or owns all this.  Apparently, they also tried to hire Bruce Bartlett, who refused, and instead, exposed Fairtax fraud.


LEGAL BASIS TO TAX CITIES
_______________________








James Bennett-- officially the # 2 man in Fairtax hustle -- insists Fairtax  made these other taxes "perfectly clear".

 Where?  Where did they make it clear?  He won't say.  

 Where did they even mention it one time, in a candid way?   It's only in a few words  here and there.   Here is their definition of a person --   



 Bennet claims this definition -- right here



 Way way way down in a long list of silly definitions...  is this definition.  And enough notice to all city county and states to send in massive taxes...... Remember, this is what Bennett himself calls "the legal basis" for these massive other taxes.


 THIS IS A FAIRTAX DOCUMENT   



That word -- "government" -- in that definition of a person, is the legal basis, according to James Bennett for all these other taxes.  Let that sink in.  That ONE WORD is the "legal basis".  


Bennett also told us Fairtax has "no plans"  to further inform city county and states about this.  "If they have questions, they can contact me"  said Bennett.   
If you don't believe me  -- contact Bennett yourself!
Bennett is either an idiot, or got sucked into the hustle.  We don't think he is an idiot.   Normal folks would know, that a definition deep down in some double talk is NOT  the same a notice to 20,000 cities, 5 thousand counties, and all 50 states, to give them actual rational notice of these nearly trillion dollars in taxes city county and states would have to pay.  But James said this was "plenty of notice"  and that Fairtax has no plans to explain it further.   Stupid? Or did James catch a ride on the Fairtax Cult bus? 


 THIS IS FROM FAIRTAX DOCUMENT  




   TRANSPARENT?  REALLY?  



Huckabee pushed the Fairtax  for years -- and still claims it's "biblical". To be fair to Huck, he probably has no clue what's in the fine print. 

In his statement about Fairtax, he claims he read HR25 and talked to "economists", apparently those "economists"  from Beacon Hill.




The guy who Boortz said proved all this great stuff about Fairtax,  Dale Jorgenson, did no such thing, and is not for Fairtax.


Kotlikoff was well paid, according to his friend Bruce Bartlett, for pushing Fairtax.  We repeat -- Kotlikoff did no research, in the definition here, about Fairtax.

What he did, was clever, and perhaps technically he did not lie, because he parsed words with "assumptions"  and clever definitions, such as defintion of a person, to fool you.

But in our opinion, it seems clear he was lying his ass off, cleverly, and got paid for it.   He got paid to do this.  And he did it.  But the documents he put out are NOT, NOT, NOT about a very simple personal retail sales tax to replace all other fed taxes.


Kotlikoff is apparently in charge of making Fairtax seem like a very sophisticated bit of "research". 

Did Kotlikoff actually lie for Fairtax?   

Maybe not, We would call it lying, as it was deliberately deceptive.   Kotlikoff never said it was only a retail sales tax that was logical, did  he? No. He wrote shit like "we assume"  and the tricky defintions of their tax base. 





__________________________________ 


Boortz cleverly created his own "critics" --  and wrote a book to refute the critics.   Hilarious.  

He of course never showed you any of what we show.   He never showed you how a cancer victim, whose entire income might be 20K a year, could, would, or should, pay 50K in taxes on their consumption of health care.


__________________________________ 
OH YOU MISSED THAT PART DAVID???

DONT FEEL BAD -



It's easy to miss.   David Kendall, who used to push Fairtax enthusiastically,  and is a PhD, had no clue either.  

Tax wages?   Tax capital expenditure?  No no no, David  said. He insisted he studied Fairtax carefully.   They just tax personal retail consumption.


So we showed him the massive other taxes.



__________________


FINE PRINT on Details of offer-- 

We were not kidding. $50,000 dollars paid to the first person who can show one page of the 22 million dollars of Fairtax research proving this "very very simple" personal retail sales tax  of 23% would replace all other fed taxes in "revenue neutral" fashion.


We have offered this to Boortz, for years.  To any charity he names, or he can keep it, we don't care.

We make the same offer to you, or anyone. We don't care -- you can't collect the 50K, because there is no 22 million dollars of Fairtax research -- and certainly not about a very very simple personal retail sales tax to replace all other fed taxes!


Hiding goofy fraud in your own fine print -- then call that research -- is  not research. Too complicated? 

Plus, since that supposed "research"  has massive other taxes, like the impossible taxes on city county and states, for wage and other expenditures, it can't be research about a very simple personal retail sales tax to replace all other fed taxed.

Ask your attorney.

 Here are important details . If you are going  sue to collect the 50,000, you must file suit in Tazwell County  Illinois, and are hereby obligated to pay all my attorney fees,  if  you do not collect the 50K offer.  

And my attorney fees include cost of travel, research, communication with me and with the court and with your attorney or yourself.   You must pay those to me,  or to my attorney, if you do not prevail in court

 You must also pay for all your  attorney fees, travel  any  and other costs related to the suit, regardless of outcome.


If you do not collect the 50K, if the court does not award you the 50K,  you must also stick the Fairtax Book up your ass sideways,  and sing for two hours on the court house steps "Im an idiot, Im a Boortz Cult Monkey, Im stupid enough to believe hustlers like Boortz and Huckabee".

Yes I realize this fine print is goofy, much like the fine print in Fairtax documents.   This fine print is a bit more crude.   I did not have hustlers write this, I wrote this in response to that hustle. 

That's why I wrote this. 

See how fine print tricks matter?

I knew that you could!